Re: [paws] New PAWS draft uploaded

[Vincent Chen <[e-mail]>]

Barry,

Thanks for the review!


On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 11:20 AM, Barry Leiba <[e-mail]>
wrote:

> > I've uploaded a new draft of PAWS that I believe addresses all the points
> > raised by the ADs, Gen-ART, and at the F2F.
>
> Vince, thanks so much for the quick work on getting this done.
> Essentially all my points have been addressed.  I have this ready to
> post as a non-blocking, minor comment whenever Pete creates a ballot
> for the document:
>
> ----------------------------------------
> A small point in the header:
> "iconectiv (formerly Telcordia Interconnection Solutions)"
> I think it's fine to put that in the "Authors' Addresses" section, but
> the header should just say "iconectiv".  I realize that takes a little
> inconvenient massaging of the XML, and probably isn't worth the
> trouble for the I-D.  Might just put that in an RFC Editor note....
>

Done. Added an RFC Editor note.


>
> -- Section 2.2 --
> As a very minor thing, I suggest this (adding URIs for the agencies,
> and specifying "U.S." for FCC):
>
> OLD
>    ETSI:  European Telecommunications Standards Institute
>    FCC:  Federal Communications Commission
> NEW
>    ETSI:  European Telecommunications Standards Institute
>          <http://etsi.org>
>    FCC:  The U.S. Federal Communications Commission
>          <http://fcc.gov>
> END
>
>
Done. Thanks for the reminder on adding "U.S.".


> -- Section 6 --
> As I had concerns in version -12 with the use of JSON schema language
> that hasn't been fully specified and is in an expired I-D, I should
> explicitly say that I'm happy with what Section 6 and its subsections
> look like in version -13.  Thanks for the fix!
>

I'm glad it was rather painless :)


> ----------------------------------------
>
> Barry
>

Given that I want to update the IANA language some more, I have another
draft ready to upload (incorporating these changes). Should I do that now?

-- 
-vince