Re: [payload] WGLC for draft-ietf-payload-rtp-howto-05

One point that's not mentioned in this document, but which might be worth bringing up, is the conventions on how you choose a payload format's clock rate.

I.e., the fact that clock rates are conventionally 90000 Hz for video (and we should give some background as to why), and they're conventionally the sampling rate for audio.

It might also be worth discussing the benefits of the Opus clock rate approach (always use the maximum supported clock rate, i.e., 48000 Hz), vs. the conventional one, in the context of the multiple-clock-rates draft.

On Aug 22, 2013, at 4:58 AM, "Ali C. Begen (abegen)" <abegen@cisco.com> wrote:

> (As a WG co-chair)
> 
> I am starting WGLC for the following draft (version 05). 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-payload-rtp-howto/
> 
> This is an important document as it outlines how someone is supposed to write the payload specs.
> 
> If there are sections you don't understand or that are not clear enough, etc. please post them to the list. We need to get this right to minimize further headaches for future documents in our WG.
> 
> The deadline for the WGLC is September 20th.
> 
> -acbegen
> _______________________________________________
> payload mailing list
> payload@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/payload
> 

--
Jonathan Lennox
jonathan@vidyo.com