Re: [payload] WGLC for draft-ietf-payload-rtp-howto-05

[Magnus Westerlund <[e-mail]>]

On 2013-10-21 14:53, DRAGE, Keith (Keith) wrote:
> Not sure which words you are having problems with.
> 
> A reasonable interpretation of the IETF rules is that anyone can
> declare anything against any internet-draft / RFC.
> 
> What we are concentrating on here is relevance, i.e. people can only
> be required to declare essential IPR against what is covered by the
> document,a nd that you cannot be expected to find all the codec IPR
> declarations being made against the payload type definition.


I was worried about making a interpretation beyond the existing rules,
and thus warping the rules.

I have now submitted a new version with the note. I have done two other
changes in the same section. First a rewording that makes it clear that
IETF rules may be different compared to what you are used to. I also
removed the time expression in regards to timely disclosure, as the
rules are not providing any exact time frames.

Cheers

Magnus Westerlund

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Multimedia Technologies, Ericsson Research EAB/TVM
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ericsson AB                | Phone  [phone]
Färögatan 6                | Mobile [phone]
SE-164 80 Stockholm, Sweden| mailto: [e-mail]
----------------------------------------------------------------------