Re: [payload] AD review: draft-ietf-payload-rfc3189bis-01

Kazuhiro Mishima <three@sfc.wide.ad.jp> Wed, 07 September 2011 07:14 UTC

Return-Path: <kaz.mishima@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: payload@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: payload@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2B7511E8081 for <payload@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Sep 2011 00:14:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.527
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.527 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.450, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1zzhrZa-srb8 for <payload@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Sep 2011 00:14:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yi0-f44.google.com (mail-yi0-f44.google.com [209.85.218.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32E0811E8073 for <payload@ietf.org>; Wed, 7 Sep 2011 00:14:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by yie12 with SMTP id 12so5447931yie.31 for <payload@ietf.org>; Wed, 07 Sep 2011 00:16:07 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=nFq4RdkL2gaiyDx00SNOSrX+gM+KqwOCkw9PDt77GYA=; b=CHg4E0Ip13tJKkl4AuLiXdLF5XVp8ijQaYMJvK3EGrMurDQv8PaBJwLYvF2K/rxzuU B/AVdARDOh9PHqjqNHocvQ8KJ71HM+06MM5afK44saAt3AWP9ofbcnEP9HGA9dyMl0Q0 5hIyLt7QLgv7PwNml4Kwot/FQHZ4KKyCPbeS0=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.236.176.33 with SMTP id a21mr29515145yhm.108.1315379766324; Wed, 07 Sep 2011 00:16:06 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: kaz.mishima@gmail.com
Received: by 10.147.170.16 with HTTP; Wed, 7 Sep 2011 00:16:06 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <3B8857F0-F4BB-411D-8B30-754D0C05E0B1@nostrum.com>
References: <3B8857F0-F4BB-411D-8B30-754D0C05E0B1@nostrum.com>
Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2011 16:16:06 +0900
X-Google-Sender-Auth: hVgfizkJsirYAqZJhVBYtlXm2PI
Message-ID: <CAE61ZqSAt2aAPxdO9R-8cFM1s9PB77ojw1a1PMabOtc5zT5x5g@mail.gmail.com>
From: Kazuhiro Mishima <three@sfc.wide.ad.jp>
To: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Cc: draft-ietf-payload-rfc3189bis@tools.ietf.org, payload@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [payload] AD review: draft-ietf-payload-rfc3189bis-01
X-BeenThere: payload@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Audio/Video Transport Payloads working group discussion list <payload.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/payload>, <mailto:payload-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/payload>
List-Post: <mailto:payload@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:payload-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/payload>, <mailto:payload-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2011 07:14:21 -0000

Hi Robert,

Thank you for your comment.
I'll update our draft with 3 comments soon.



2011/9/1 Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>:
> Summary: This draft needs a small revision before moving to IETF Last Call.
>
> Akimichi Ogawa was removed from the author list, and not credited in an acknowledgment section.
> I think it would be appropriate to add one. This probably also means the draft should use the
> pre-5378 boilerplate. Please issue a revision with those changes (or let me know why they are not needed).
>
> A minor point to consider while making that update:
>
> The 7th point in the Major changes section does not stand alone - what is it trying to say? Is it
> just pointing to aligning with the advice in draft-ietf-payload-rtp-howto?
>
> RjS
>
> _______________________________________________
> payload mailing list
> payload@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/payload
>