[payload] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on draft-ietf-payload-vp8-17: (with COMMENT)

"Kathleen Moriarty" <Kathleen.Moriarty.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 17 September 2015 02:24 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Kathleen Moriarty <Kathleen.Moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <20150917022433.25044.53666.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2015 19:24:33 -0700
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/payload/e6BrKlS4qK56rM0KUlZ0UWQxfaw>
Cc: payload-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-payload-vp8@ietf.org, payload@ietf.org
Subject: [payload] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on draft-ietf-payload-vp8-17: (with COMMENT)

Kathleen Moriarty has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-payload-vp8-17: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-payload-vp8/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Why is this a SHOULD:
Applications SHOULD use one or more appropriate strong security
mechanisms.

Wouldn't it be more helpful to point out why you would use specific
security mechanisms for security considerations?

[payload] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on dra… Kathleen Moriarty
Re: [payload] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on… Ben Campbell
Re: [payload] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on… Kathleen Moriarty
Re: [payload] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on… Kathleen Moriarty