IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [payload] I-D Action: draft-ietf-payload-rtp-g718-02.txt

Glen Zorn <glenzorn@gmail.com> Fri, 10 August 2012 06:47 UTC

Return-Path: <glenzorn@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: payload@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: payload@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A947B11E80FF for <payload@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Aug 2012 23:47:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.346
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.346 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.252, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QdaiQ7sMIjMi for <payload@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Aug 2012 23:47:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pb0-f44.google.com (mail-pb0-f44.google.com [209.85.160.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 923AC21F856D for <payload@ietf.org>; Thu, 9 Aug 2012 23:47:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by pbbrr4 with SMTP id rr4so2226052pbb.31 for <payload@ietf.org>; Thu, 09 Aug 2012 23:47:50 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:from:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:content-type:organization :date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer; bh=5CRBtwWsrzZHKoDbm+uY4FBDIwaGkoEIXcCW8uINZXY=; b=NH9kkn0oER/5RPOaBH73rTW2xCAOFu3xpS1W5Z/geBvcMdfOYPSIZU9mRwR1xyCkXm QQDO7BJ0Q0KGuZWnuM9tTaGFVI8y6hQG8PI+Dlx9oVvjodjS2CPZAUIOt2PWr5ugN/06 bfnNZe+Ayz3D3+XucM2UlrZKJWqbfCcZ0JhPHyJ3Y6Rq6xfO9KIODSYE7+kg3QkIQfkS NDVwPT6lH5BnPd7hvGcUyaJZBNfGyxKS2CNLFdjy4/2RW+loEW7qTz8XOKyYxAStxOIS 1VW4n16nzwwjGon68+75Hcv3oehtylHXm+fTX3Ej4DI7oGYGQuYCFvWOxbwimGaNCEyo KB6g==
Received: by 10.68.232.103 with SMTP id tn7mr10035966pbc.86.1344581270124; Thu, 09 Aug 2012 23:47:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.0.102] (ppp-124-122-250-210.revip2.asianet.co.th. [124.122.250.210]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id kc7sm2752984pbb.5.2012.08.09.23.47.47 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 09 Aug 2012 23:47:49 -0700 (PDT)
From: Glen Zorn <glenzorn@gmail.com>
To: payload-chairs@tools.ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <CBCEE25A.86D52%stewe@stewe.org>
References: <CBCEE25A.86D52%stewe@stewe.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=-o6oitK+MR+juhZ4e1+GW"
Organization: Network Zen
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2012 13:47:45 +0700
Message-ID: <1344581265.4635.5.camel@gwz-laptop>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.3 (2.32.3-1.fc14)
Cc: payload@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [payload] I-D Action: draft-ietf-payload-rtp-g718-02.txt
X-BeenThere: payload@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Audio/Video Transport Payloads working group discussion list <payload.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/payload>, <mailto:payload-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/payload>
List-Post: <mailto:payload@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:payload-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/payload>, <mailto:payload-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2012 06:47:51 -0000

On Tue, 2012-05-08 at 12:50 +0000, Stephan Wenger wrote:

> There was a bit of email back-and-forth, as well as hallway discussions
> here in Geneva.  It appears that there will not be an updated version of
> G.718 at this meeting.  Further, the impact of the unfinished ITU work
> (floating point implementation) to the RTP payload spec seems minimal.  As
> the next ITU-T SG16 meeting is many months away, I would now suggest that
> it's ok to move forward with the IETF's approval and publication process.
> Stephan


It's been almost 3 months; could we do something?


> 
> 
> On 5.7.2012 14:45 , "Stephan Wenger" <stewe@stewe.org> wrote:
> 
> >SG16 is meeting this week.  Wait one more week, and you will know whether
> >the ITU spec advances now.
> >Stephan
> >
> >
> >On 5.7.2012 14:41 , "Glen Zorn" <glenzorn@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >>On 05/07/2012 07:36 PM, internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote:
> >>> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
> >>>directories. This draft is a work item of the Audio/Video Transport
> >>>Payloads Working Group of the IETF.
> >>>
> >>> 	Title           : RTP Payload Format for G.718 Speech/Audio
> >>> 	Author(s)       : Glen Zorn
> >>>                            Ye-Kui Wang
> >>>                            Ari Lakaniemi
> >>> 	Filename        : draft-ietf-payload-rtp-g718-02.txt
> >>> 	Pages           : 27
> >>> 	Date            : 2012-05-07
> >>>
> >>>     This document specifies the Real-Time Transport Protocol (RTP)
> >>>     payload format for the Embedded Variable Bit-Rate (EV-VBR) speech/
> >>>     audio codec, specified in ITU-T G.718.  A media type registration
> >>>for
> >>>     this RTP payload format is also included.
> >>
> >>This document has been on hold waiting input from ITU-T re: G.7018B for
> >>quite some time now.  I suggest that we just take it to WGLC & publish
> >>w/o waiting any more.  Opinions?
> >>_______________________________________________
> >>payload mailing list
> >>payload@ietf.org
> >>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/payload
> >>
> >
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >payload mailing list
> >payload@ietf.org
> >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/payload
> >
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> payload mailing list
> payload@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/payload

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email