IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [payload] I-D Action: draft-ietf-payload-rtp-g718-02.txt

Stephan Wenger <stewe@stewe.org> Tue, 08 May 2012 12:50 UTC

Return-Path: <stewe@stewe.org>
X-Original-To: payload@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: payload@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08F8421F84C3 for <payload@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 May 2012 05:50:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.758
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.758 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.159, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id auq9HEAFXQxK for <payload@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 May 2012 05:50:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ch1outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com (ch1ehsobe005.messaging.microsoft.com [216.32.181.185]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3322121F8535 for <payload@ietf.org>; Tue, 8 May 2012 05:50:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail126-ch1-R.bigfish.com (10.43.68.225) by CH1EHSOBE008.bigfish.com (10.43.70.58) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.225.23; Tue, 8 May 2012 12:49:52 +0000
Received: from mail126-ch1 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail126-ch1-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2822720576 for <payload@ietf.org>; Tue, 8 May 2012 12:49:52 +0000 (UTC)
X-SpamScore: -36
X-BigFish: PS-36(zzbb2dI9371I1503M936eK1432N98dKzz1202h1082kzz1033IL8275bh8275dhz2fh2a8h668h839h944he5bh)
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:157.56.240.133; KIP:(null); UIP:(null); IPV:NLI; H:BL2PRD0710HT003.namprd07.prod.outlook.com; RD:none; EFVD:NLI
Received-SPF: pass (mail126-ch1: domain of stewe.org designates 157.56.240.133 as permitted sender) client-ip=157.56.240.133; envelope-from=stewe@stewe.org; helo=BL2PRD0710HT003.namprd07.prod.outlook.com ; .outlook.com ;
Received: from mail126-ch1 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail126-ch1 (MessageSwitch) id 1336481389790056_15860; Tue, 8 May 2012 12:49:49 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from CH1EHSMHS029.bigfish.com (snatpool3.int.messaging.microsoft.com [10.43.68.226]) by mail126-ch1.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD09E2C051C for <payload@ietf.org>; Tue, 8 May 2012 12:49:49 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from BL2PRD0710HT003.namprd07.prod.outlook.com (157.56.240.133) by CH1EHSMHS029.bigfish.com (10.43.70.29) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.225.23; Tue, 8 May 2012 12:49:49 +0000
Received: from BL2PRD0710MB349.namprd07.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.1.237]) by BL2PRD0710HT003.namprd07.prod.outlook.com ([10.255.102.38]) with mapi id 14.16.0152.000; Tue, 8 May 2012 12:50:02 +0000
From: Stephan Wenger <stewe@stewe.org>
To: "payload@ietf.org" <payload@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [payload] I-D Action: draft-ietf-payload-rtp-g718-02.txt
Thread-Index: AQHNLE4CnR+NNdAm10iOeBVQOhSMTJa+ROEAgAAiq4CAAZOHAA==
Date: Tue, 08 May 2012 12:50:02 +0000
Message-ID: <CBCEE25A.86D52%stewe@stewe.org>
In-Reply-To: <CBCD9081.86C99%stewe@stewe.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.255.102.4]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <A28AE45CF553A846B8089C7913451B35@namprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: stewe.org
Subject: Re: [payload] I-D Action: draft-ietf-payload-rtp-g718-02.txt
X-BeenThere: payload@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Audio/Video Transport Payloads working group discussion list <payload.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/payload>, <mailto:payload-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/payload>
List-Post: <mailto:payload@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:payload-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/payload>, <mailto:payload-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 May 2012 12:50:08 -0000

There was a bit of email back-and-forth, as well as hallway discussions
here in Geneva.  It appears that there will not be an updated version of
G.718 at this meeting.  Further, the impact of the unfinished ITU work
(floating point implementation) to the RTP payload spec seems minimal.  As
the next ITU-T SG16 meeting is many months away, I would now suggest that
it's ok to move forward with the IETF's approval and publication process.
Stephan


On 5.7.2012 14:45 , "Stephan Wenger" <stewe@stewe.org> wrote:

>SG16 is meeting this week.  Wait one more week, and you will know whether
>the ITU spec advances now.
>Stephan
>
>
>On 5.7.2012 14:41 , "Glen Zorn" <glenzorn@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>On 05/07/2012 07:36 PM, internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote:
>>> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
>>>directories. This draft is a work item of the Audio/Video Transport
>>>Payloads Working Group of the IETF.
>>>
>>> 	Title           : RTP Payload Format for G.718 Speech/Audio
>>> 	Author(s)       : Glen Zorn
>>>                            Ye-Kui Wang
>>>                            Ari Lakaniemi
>>> 	Filename        : draft-ietf-payload-rtp-g718-02.txt
>>> 	Pages           : 27
>>> 	Date            : 2012-05-07
>>>
>>>     This document specifies the Real-Time Transport Protocol (RTP)
>>>     payload format for the Embedded Variable Bit-Rate (EV-VBR) speech/
>>>     audio codec, specified in ITU-T G.718.  A media type registration
>>>for
>>>     this RTP payload format is also included.
>>
>>This document has been on hold waiting input from ITU-T re: G.7018B for
>>quite some time now.  I suggest that we just take it to WGLC & publish
>>w/o waiting any more.  Opinions?
>>_______________________________________________
>>payload mailing list
>>payload@ietf.org
>>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/payload
>>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>payload mailing list
>payload@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/payload
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email