Re: [payload] G.718B payload format

Glen Zorn <gwz@net-zen.net> Sun, 15 May 2011 07:47 UTC

Return-Path: <gwz@net-zen.net>
X-Original-To: payload@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: payload@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6366E066C for <payload@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 15 May 2011 00:47:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SG94cmzmiupu for <payload@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 15 May 2011 00:47:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpauth16.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net (smtpauth16.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net [64.202.165.22]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 58D76E065D for <payload@ietf.org>; Sun, 15 May 2011 00:47:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 15908 invoked from network); 15 May 2011 07:25:27 -0000
Received: from unknown (124.122.83.151) by smtpauth16.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net (64.202.165.22) with ESMTP; 15 May 2011 07:25:27 -0000
Message-ID: <4DCF84F6.3010003@net-zen.net>
Date: Sun, 15 May 2011 14:47:02 +0700
From: Glen Zorn <gwz@net-zen.net>
Organization: Network Zen
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 Thunderbird/3.1.10
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Miaolei <lei.miao@huawei.com>
References: <11C35F73DA9BE14D92014E6B8E22F7F004B74D@SZXEML519-MBX.china.huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <11C35F73DA9BE14D92014E6B8E22F7F004B74D@SZXEML519-MBX.china.huawei.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------080505080203020805070203"
Cc: "lasse.j.laaksonen@nokia.com" <lasse.j.laaksonen@nokia.com>, payload-chairs@tools.ietf.org, "payload@ietf.org" <payload@ietf.org>, yusuke hiwasaki <hiwasaki.yusuke@lab.ntt.co.jp>, "'Virette, David'" <david.virette@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [payload] G.718B payload format
X-BeenThere: payload@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Audio/Video Transport Payloads working group discussion list <payload.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/payload>, <mailto:payload-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/payload>
List-Post: <mailto:payload@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:payload-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/payload>, <mailto:payload-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 15 May 2011 07:47:14 -0000

On 3/7/2011 2:45 PM, Miaolei wrote:
> Dear Glen
>  
> First, thanks for your hard work on G.718 payload format.

Sorry for the slow reply!

>  
> I have worked on the ITU-T G.718B(ex G.718-SWB) standardization and
> would like to know the status or plan for G.718B payload format.
> In the draft-ietf-avt-rtp-g718-05.txt, it was said that
> ----
> ITU-T SG16 is currently working on a set of extension layers in order
>    to provide so-called super-wideband (SWB) audio and stereophonic
>    encoding extensions on top of the G.718 core codec. 
> -----
>  
> Actually the SWB mono part have been approved in ITU-T in Mar. 2010.
> Stereo work is still ongoing.
> Is it possible to consider the G.718B together with G.718 for the
> payload format?
> For example, we can add some L-IDs for the G.718B layers.

It's really up to the payload WG and its Chairs, but it's OK with me.

...