Re: [payload] G.718B payload format
"Ali C. Begen (abegen)" <abegen@cisco.com> Sun, 15 May 2011 18:03 UTC
Return-Path: <abegen@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: payload@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: payload@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE2A9E06D6 for <payload@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 15 May 2011 11:03:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zrOu99y4eCG8 for <payload@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 15 May 2011 11:03:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sj-iport-1.cisco.com (sj-iport-1.cisco.com [171.71.176.70]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22C3EE068C for <payload@ietf.org>; Sun, 15 May 2011 11:03:37 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=abegen@cisco.com; l=1922; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1305482617; x=1306692217; h=mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:subject:date: message-id:in-reply-to:references:from:to:cc; bh=izPWWQKQDEZBN4zM68kKLMbJb+Ndaq8rHOAbvGtBF08=; b=aq/80sX9BBIXH7xXc0qC0y2gkuM0Kyqm6knZeo3gPh41joCDzBIJeock Yd9tkelbiJVSV1jQ3MJZfpkrcVUxaU4R2Qh3NxoyMz0Hdl/Rhx4rYTluy j+SzKv8CysPlUnvR/7oKbDyrZPyZJUXoGEYAVjVPb79KrPMMZtbuxUpIG A=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ag8BACsV0E2rRDoH/2dsb2JhbACEWJJ3jVVwd6pbjQOPdoErg2eBBwSGUI15il0
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.64,369,1301875200"; d="scan'208";a="448070040"
Received: from mtv-core-2.cisco.com ([171.68.58.7]) by sj-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 15 May 2011 18:03:36 +0000
Received: from xbh-sjc-221.amer.cisco.com (xbh-sjc-221.cisco.com [128.107.191.63]) by mtv-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p4FI3aMi018202; Sun, 15 May 2011 18:03:36 GMT
Received: from xmb-sjc-215.amer.cisco.com ([171.70.151.169]) by xbh-sjc-221.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Sun, 15 May 2011 11:03:36 -0700
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Date: Sun, 15 May 2011 11:03:29 -0700
Message-ID: <04CAD96D4C5A3D48B1919248A8FE0D540EFFE906@xmb-sjc-215.amer.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <4DCF84F6.3010003@net-zen.net>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [payload] G.718B payload format
Thread-Index: AcwS1FIo4J7NS41gT9KxtAV9h/R7IwAVfJEw
References: <11C35F73DA9BE14D92014E6B8E22F7F004B74D@SZXEML519-MBX.china.huawei.com> <4DCF84F6.3010003@net-zen.net>
From: "Ali C. Begen (abegen)" <abegen@cisco.com>
To: Glen Zorn <gwz@net-zen.net>, Miaolei <lei.miao@huawei.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 15 May 2011 18:03:36.0705 (UTC) FILETIME=[69891F10:01CC132A]
Cc: lasse.j.laaksonen@nokia.com, yusuke hiwasaki <hiwasaki.yusuke@lab.ntt.co.jp>, "Virette, David" <david.virette@huawei.com>, payload@ietf.org, payload-chairs@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [payload] G.718B payload format
X-BeenThere: payload@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Audio/Video Transport Payloads working group discussion list <payload.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/payload>, <mailto:payload-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/payload>
List-Post: <mailto:payload@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:payload-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/payload>, <mailto:payload-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 15 May 2011 18:03:37 -0000
> -----Original Message----- > From: payload-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:payload-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Glen Zorn > Sent: Sunday, May 15, 2011 3:47 AM > To: Miaolei > Cc: lasse.j.laaksonen@nokia.com; payload-chairs@tools.ietf.org; payload@ietf.org; yusuke hiwasaki; 'Virette,David' > Subject: Re: [payload] G.718B payload format > > On 3/7/2011 2:45 PM, Miaolei wrote: > > Dear Glen > > > > First, thanks for your hard work on G.718 payload format. > > Sorry for the slow reply! > > > > > I have worked on the ITU-T G.718B(ex G.718-SWB) standardization and > > would like to know the status or plan for G.718B payload format. > > In the draft-ietf-avt-rtp-g718-05.txt, it was said that > > ---- > > ITU-T SG16 is currently working on a set of extension layers in order > > to provide so-called super-wideband (SWB) audio and stereophonic > > encoding extensions on top of the G.718 core codec. > > ----- > > > > Actually the SWB mono part have been approved in ITU-T in Mar. 2010. > > Stereo work is still ongoing. > > Is it possible to consider the G.718B together with G.718 for the > > payload format? > > For example, we can add some L-IDs for the G.718B layers. > > It's really up to the payload WG and its Chairs, but it's OK with me. I think it makes sense. Miaolei, I am assuming you could your help with the text? -acbegen > ...
- Re: [payload] G.718B payload format Glen Zorn
- Re: [payload] G.718B payload format Ali C. Begen (abegen)