IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [payload] WGLC on draft-ietf-payload-melpe-02

"Victor Demjanenko, Ph.D." <victor.demjanenko@vocal.com> Thu, 28 July 2016 18:21 UTC

Return-Path: <victor.demjanenko@vocal.com>
X-Original-To: payload@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: payload@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4787D12DBBC for <payload@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Jul 2016 11:21:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.5
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.5 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-0.5, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MSGID_MULTIPLE_AT=1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gP8gEb-ZKS94 for <payload@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Jul 2016 11:21:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cuda.olm1.com (cuda.olm1.com [72.236.255.32]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DFA7812DBBB for <payload@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Jul 2016 11:21:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1469730086-092fd37a54354310001-U2jSCT
Received: from host105.olm1.com (host105.olm1.com [72.236.255.15]) by cuda.olm1.com with ESMTP id 7oeEhBMGiusp5ejI (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 28 Jul 2016 14:21:26 -0400 (EDT)
X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: victor.demjanenko@vocal.com
X-Barracuda-Apparent-Source-IP: 72.236.255.15
Received: from ClintonLT (rrcs-72-43-202-98.nys.biz.rr.com [72.43.202.98]) by host105.olm1.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8FFCBB42613; Thu, 28 Jul 2016 14:21:26 -0400 (EDT)
From: "Victor Demjanenko, Ph.D." <victor.demjanenko@vocal.com>
To: 'Roni Even' <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com>, payload@ietf.org
References: <00c801d1e706$4b9374f0$e2ba5ed0$@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <00c801d1e706$4b9374f0$e2ba5ed0$@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2016 14:21:21 -0400
X-ASG-Orig-Subj: RE: WGLC on draft-ietf-payload-melpe-02
Message-ID: <081601d1e8fc$d831a5b0$8894f110$@demjanenko>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0817_01D1E8DB.512005B0"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
Thread-Index: AdHnBhrfOOr7ktHaRfyfFTzHl5kaagANMLNA
Content-Language: en-us
X-Barracuda-Connect: host105.olm1.com[72.236.255.15]
X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1469730086
X-Barracuda-Encrypted: ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384
X-Barracuda-URL: https://72.236.255.32:443/cgi-mod/mark.cgi
X-Virus-Scanned: by bsmtpd at olm1.com
X-Barracuda-BRTS-Status: 1
X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: 0.01
X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=0.01 using global scores of TAG_LEVEL=1000.0 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=1000.0 KILL_LEVEL=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE, MSGID_MULTIPLE_AT
X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.3.31585 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.01 MSGID_MULTIPLE_AT Message-ID contains multiple '@' characters 0.00 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/payload/pz-CLM44KYonQ0Rl41G-krINCa4>
Cc: draft-ietf-payload-melpe@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [payload] WGLC on draft-ietf-payload-melpe-02
X-BeenThere: payload@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Audio/Video Transport Payloads working group discussion list <payload.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/payload>, <mailto:payload-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/payload/>
List-Post: <mailto:payload@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:payload-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/payload>, <mailto:payload-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2016 18:21:33 -0000

Hi Roni,

 

We do not know of any IP related to packing MELPe speech coded data into RTP
frames as proposed by our draft-ietf-payload-melpe-02.  

 

There may be IPR claims regarding the MELPe speech coder itself but as we
understand that speech coder IPR is not relevant for the purposes of our
draft

 

Regards,

 

Victor Demjanenko, Ph.D.

Associate

VOCAL Technologies, Ltd.

 

 

From: Roni Even [mailto:ron.even.tlv@gmail.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2016 2:24 AM
To: payload@ietf.org
Cc: draft-ietf-payload-melpe@ietf.org
Subject: WGLC on draft-ietf-payload-melpe-02

 

Hi,

I would like to start a WGLC on
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-payload-melpe-02  , RTP Payload
Format for MELPe Codec
 
 
 

The WGLC will end on August 9th , 2016

 

Please review the draft and send comments to the list.

 

For the draft authors;  Are you aware of any IPR that applies to
draft-ietf-payload-melpe-02? 

If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules?

The above question is needed for the document write-up when sent to
publication.
 
 

Thanks

 

Roni Even

Payload  co-chair

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email