[payload] draft-rea-payload-rtp-aptx-01
Michel Quaix <quaix@digigram.com> Thu, 02 February 2012 15:01 UTC
Return-Path: <quaix@digigram.com>
X-Original-To: payload@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: payload@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC4DB21F85AF for <payload@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Feb 2012 07:01:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.487
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.487 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-1.11, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UveCugLnf47x for <payload@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Feb 2012 07:01:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qw0-f44.google.com (mail-qw0-f44.google.com [209.85.216.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CF1521F8526 for <payload@ietf.org>; Thu, 2 Feb 2012 07:01:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: by qafi29 with SMTP id i29so28856qaf.10 for <payload@ietf.org>; Thu, 02 Feb 2012 07:01:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.224.116.201 with SMTP id n9mr4464290qaq.16.1328194861641; Thu, 02 Feb 2012 07:01:01 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.229.32.2 with HTTP; Thu, 2 Feb 2012 07:00:21 -0800 (PST)
From: Michel Quaix <quaix@digigram.com>
Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2012 16:00:21 +0100
Message-ID: <CAMM6nBi0n4nh2MyixTeL9Lm-SDHn2L-kXBtXFY3d=emxw-QBQQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: payload@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="20cf3074b64aebafbf04b7fc7643"
Subject: [payload] draft-rea-payload-rtp-aptx-01
X-BeenThere: payload@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Audio/Video Transport Payloads working group discussion list <payload.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/payload>, <mailto:payload-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/payload>
List-Post: <mailto:payload@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:payload-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/payload>, <mailto:payload-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2012 15:01:14 -0000
Hello, This is Michel Quaix from Digigram. Here are the comments from Digigram: - At the end of paragraph 3, you wrote "The bit rate of the auxiliary data channel is 1/4 of the sample frequency." which is 12kbps @ 48kHz. Then you give an example @ 48kHz in which the auxiliary data bit rate is 16kbps (8 bits every 24 left channel samples @ 48kHz = 16kbps). - In paragraph 6, LSB is defined as the Most Significant Byte instead of being defined as the Least Significant Byte. Except for these minor issues, we have implemented this draft, it works and therefore we support the approval of the draft as an RFC. Best Regards, Michel QUAIX *Software Development Manager* *Phone: 33 (0)4 76 52 47 47 Fax: 33 (0)4 76 52 18 44 mailto: **quaix@digigram.com* <quaix@digigram.com> *http://www.digigram.com* <http://www.digigram.com/> *Digigram** *** *INOVALLEE, **82/84 Allée Galilée** **38330 MONTBONNOT-SAINT-MARTIN** * *FRANCE*
- [payload] draft-rea-payload-rtp-aptx-01 Robert Madinger
- Re: [payload] draft-rea-payload-rtp-aptx-01 Derrick Rea
- Re: [payload] draft-rea-payload-rtp-aptx-01 Hans-Heinrich Hansen
- [payload] draft-rea-payload-rtp-aptx-01 Michel Quaix
- [payload] draft-rea-payload-rtp-aptx-01 kari.maenpaa
- Re: [payload] draft-rea-payload-rtp-aptx-01 Ross Finlayson
- Re: [payload] draft-rea-payload-rtp-aptx-01 Derrick Rea