IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Pce] WG Last Call of draft-ietf-pce-vendor-constraints-10

Julien Meuric <julien.meuric@orange.com> Thu, 27 June 2013 09:13 UTC

Return-Path: <julien.meuric@orange.com>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 820C221F9C29 for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Jun 2013 02:13:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.649
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.649 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, J_CHICKENPOX_32=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1mZsWOIZIdk3 for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Jun 2013 02:13:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p-mail2.rd.orange.com (p-mail2.rd.orange.com [195.101.245.16]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEB1021F9A26 for <pce@ietf.org>; Thu, 27 Jun 2013 02:13:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p-mail2.rd.orange.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id AFE97E30113 for <pce@ietf.org>; Thu, 27 Jun 2013 11:14:05 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from ftrdsmtp1.rd.francetelecom.fr (unknown [10.192.128.46]) by p-mail2.rd.orange.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAEA7E30112 for <pce@ietf.org>; Thu, 27 Jun 2013 11:14:05 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from ftrdmel10.rd.francetelecom.fr ([10.192.128.44]) by ftrdsmtp1.rd.francetelecom.fr with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Thu, 27 Jun 2013 11:13:26 +0200
Received: from [10.193.71.100] ([10.193.71.100]) by ftrdmel10.rd.francetelecom.fr with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Thu, 27 Jun 2013 11:13:25 +0200
Message-ID: <51CC0235.5010700@orange.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2013 11:13:25 +0200
From: Julien Meuric <julien.meuric@orange.com>
Organization: France Telecom
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130510 Thunderbird/17.0.6
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: pce@ietf.org
References: <51B82C91.3050304@orange.com>
In-Reply-To: <51B82C91.3050304@orange.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 27 Jun 2013 09:13:26.0005 (UTC) FILETIME=[949C0250:01CE7316]
Subject: Re: [Pce] WG Last Call of draft-ietf-pce-vendor-constraints-10
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pce>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2013 09:13:32 -0000

Hi all.

This last call has ended. Thanks for the feedback. The chairs' review 
will follow. Authors, before we send the I-D to the IESG, you will be 
expected to address the comments, at least by responding.

The side output of the discussion looks interesting. Several WG 
contributors seem to volunteer to edit an I-D summarizing PCEP 
(stateless) extensions: that could be valuable.

Regards,

Julien


On 06/12/2013 10:08, Julien Meuric wrote:
> Hi PCE'rs.
>
> This message ignites a 2-week-long WG last call for 
> draft-ietf-pce-vendor-constraints-10. Please send your comments on the 
> I-D to the PCE mailing list by Wednesday June 26.
>
> Best regards,
>
> JP & Julien
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pce mailing list
> Pce@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email