IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Pce] WG Last Call of draft-ietf-pce-vendor-constraints-10

"Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Tue, 25 June 2013 17:21 UTC

Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 068BB11E812F for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Jun 2013 10:21:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_32=0.6]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sY3-qzZkL0Lm for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Jun 2013 10:21:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from asmtp5.iomartmail.com (asmtp5.iomartmail.com [62.128.201.176]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92B4921F9A86 for <pce@ietf.org>; Tue, 25 Jun 2013 10:21:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from asmtp5.iomartmail.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by asmtp5.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r5PHLbGR023127; Tue, 25 Jun 2013 18:21:38 +0100
Received: from 950129200 (dsl-sp-81-140-15-32.in-addr.broadbandscope.com [81.140.15.32]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp5.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r5PHLXZY023006 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 25 Jun 2013 18:21:37 +0100
From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: 'Julien Meuric' <julien.meuric@orange.com>, pce@ietf.org
References: <51B82C91.3050304@orange.com> <51C8747F.50604@orange.com>
In-Reply-To: <51C8747F.50604@orange.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2013 18:21:31 +0100
Message-ID: <0f1101ce71c8$71d5adb0$55810910$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQEqpOpstsAJH4M5MrCov4cdbJ6sIwGL5M+6moHnkRA=
Content-Language: en-gb
Subject: Re: [Pce] WG Last Call of draft-ietf-pce-vendor-constraints-10
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pce>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2013 17:21:47 -0000

Thanks Julien,
I appreciate that.
Since I had been told that a number of people have applications of this
mechanism, it would be good if they could speak up.

As an author, I guess I can't offer a review :-)

Adrian

> -----Original Message-----
> From: pce-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:pce-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Julien
> Meuric
> Sent: 24 June 2013 17:32
> To: pce@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Pce] WG Last Call of draft-ietf-pce-vendor-constraints-10
> 
> Hi all.
> 
> The I-D is not particularly long and is certainly well-known by many of
> you: a few reviews would be much appreciated.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> JP & Julien
> 
> 
> Le 12/06/2013 10:08, Julien Meuric a écrit :
> > Hi PCE'rs.
> >
> > This message ignites a 2-week-long WG last call for
> > draft-ietf-pce-vendor-constraints-10. Please send your comments on the
> > I-D to the PCE mailing list by Wednesday June 26.
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> > JP & Julien
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Pce mailing list
> > Pce@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
> >
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Pce mailing list
> Pce@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email