Re: [Pce] IESG comments on draft-ietf-pce-discovery-reqs-04

JP Vasseur <jvasseur@cisco.com> Sat, 03 June 2006 12:15 UTC

Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FmV29-0000Zp-Mt; Sat, 03 Jun 2006 08:15:13 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FmV27-0000Sf-Ql for pce@ietf.org; Sat, 03 Jun 2006 08:15:11 -0400
Received: from sj-iport-6.cisco.com ([171.71.176.117]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FmV25-00021L-Co for pce@ietf.org; Sat, 03 Jun 2006 08:15:11 -0400
Received: from sj-dkim-3.cisco.com ([171.71.179.195]) by sj-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP; 03 Jun 2006 05:15:09 -0700
Received: from rtp-core-1.cisco.com (rtp-core-1.cisco.com [64.102.124.12]) by sj-dkim-3.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k53CF8U9031939; Sat, 3 Jun 2006 05:15:08 -0700
Received: from xbh-rtp-201.amer.cisco.com (xbh-rtp-201.cisco.com [64.102.31.12]) by rtp-core-1.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id k53CF8ku000267; Sat, 3 Jun 2006 08:15:08 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from xfe-rtp-201.amer.cisco.com ([64.102.31.38]) by xbh-rtp-201.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Sat, 3 Jun 2006 08:15:07 -0400
Received: from [10.86.104.178] ([10.86.104.178]) by xfe-rtp-201.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Sat, 3 Jun 2006 08:15:07 -0400
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v750)
In-Reply-To: <D109C8C97C15294495117745780657AE050E26B4@ftrdmel1.rd.francetelecom.fr>
References: <D109C8C97C15294495117745780657AE050E26B4@ftrdmel1.rd.francetelecom.fr>
Message-Id: <8E7DF6B3-36C9-442E-B9D9-CD9C03BAF6CB@cisco.com>
From: JP Vasseur <jvasseur@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [Pce] IESG comments on draft-ietf-pce-discovery-reqs-04
Date: Sat, 03 Jun 2006 08:15:04 -0400
To: LE ROUX Jean-Louis RD-CORE-LAN <jeanlouis.leroux@orange-ft.com>, pce@ietf.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.750)
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 03 Jun 2006 12:15:07.0173 (UTC) FILETIME=[5A097D50:01C68707]
DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; l=4085; t=1149336908; x=1150200908; c=relaxed/simple; s=sjdkim3001; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=jvasseur@cisco.com; z=From:JP=20Vasseur=20<jvasseur@cisco.com> |Subject:Re=3A=20[Pce]=20IESG=20comments=20on=20draft-ietf-pce-discovery-reqs-04; X=v=3Dcisco.com=3B=20h=3DEyJMD59LRkk8T2TeYjg/NLhBqqA=3D; b=WHRao1DKzhu4Mkss+KRV3yP6LqVjdxIxpbRM+hm3EQdcxHlXu67ysRH5iHhjyt8dvUKbWLMb 4nj2XrNq2pQ5T6YvNRozV1SuEAl3nYU+0vkgSNyL3MP+xYLKPeYq80wi;
Authentication-Results: sj-dkim-3.cisco.com; header.From=jvasseur@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( 31 extraneous bytes; sig from cisco.com verified; );
X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 14582b0692e7f70ce7111d04db3781c8
Cc:
X-BeenThere: pce@lists.ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.lists.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/pce>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@lists.ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0046229723=="
Errors-To: pce-bounces@lists.ietf.org

Dear WG,

Considering the amount of change on the manageability section, we'll  
issue a short incremental WG LC on the new revision.

Thanks.

JP.

On Jun 2, 2006, at 12:03 PM, LE ROUX Jean-Louis RD-CORE-LAN wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> During the IESG review of the PCE discovery Requirements draft,
> we received a set of comments, which can be found at
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi? 
> command=view_id&dTag=13336&rfc_flag=0
>
> We are currently working together with the WG chairs to address  
> these comments.
> In particular we have significantly detailed the manageability  
> section, we added
> requirements on the configuration of PCE Discovery parameters, on  
> the PCE
> Discovery MIB modules and on the control of protocol operations.
>
> We will submit a new revision soon.
>
> Best Regards,
>
> JL et al.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pce mailing list
> Pce@lists.ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
Pce@lists.ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce