Re: [Pce] New Version Notification for draft-ietf-pce-hierarchy-extensions-06.txt

<daniel@olddog.co.uk> Mon, 05 November 2018 04:48 UTC

Sender: Daniel King <dk@danielking.net>
From: daniel@olddog.co.uk
To: pce@ietf.org
References: <154139213187.31948.2999497175670234417.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <154139213187.31948.2999497175670234417.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2018 11:50:39 +0700
Message-ID: <000901d474c3$1bc6dfd0$53549f70$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Thread-Index: AQErx9+pWFJpHZZpHNVtKCyhtrdzFaaR8nSA
Content-Language: en-gb
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/2SLu1KzER3vrEkex0zU7fVvO0jM>
Subject: Re: [Pce] New Version Notification for draft-ietf-pce-hierarchy-extensions-06.txt
Precedence: list

Greetings PCE'rs,

Please find a new version of draft-ietf-pce-hierarchy-extensions (version 06). Thanks to Adrian Farrel for his recent and thorough review, it helped the authors polish the I-D. 

Revisions to the new version of the I-D include:

- Updated Abstract
- Updated Introduction
- Updated Security text
- Added RFC7399 (Unanswered questions of the PCE) text and reference to Introduction Scope
- Consistency of "Objective Functions" text
- Revised H-PCE-CAPABILITY TLV format and behavior
- Cleaned up Section 3.3.1 OF Codes 
- Consistency of text and readability updates
- Added IANA allocation policy to IANA Section
- Implementation Status moved to an Appendix with statement that this will be removed before publication

There is one material change to protocol solution in the I-D. It is proposed that the H-PCE-CAPABILITY TLV should now use one flag (P-bit), instead of two. If set, will signal that the child PCE wishes to use the peer PCE as a parent PCE:

https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-pce-hierarchy-extensions-06#page-8

The authors will follow-up with Adrian, via the PCE list, and respond to his specific comments in a separate email. 

BR, Dan. 

-----Original Message-----
From: internet-drafts@ietf.org <internet-drafts@ietf.org> 
Sent: 05 November 2018 11:29
To: Oscar de Dios <ogondio@tid.es>; Daniel King <daniel@olddog.co.uk>; Fatai Zhang <zhangfatai@huawei.com>; Oscar Gonzalez de Dios <ogondio@tid.es>; Quintin Zhao <quintin.zhao@huawei.com>; pce-chairs@ietf.org
Subject: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-pce-hierarchy-extensions-06.txt


A new version of I-D, draft-ietf-pce-hierarchy-extensions-06.txt
has been successfully submitted by Daniel King and posted to the IETF repository.

Name:		draft-ietf-pce-hierarchy-extensions
Revision:	06
Title:		Extensions to Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) for Hierarchical Path Computation Elements (PCE)
Document date:	2018-11-05
Group:		pce
Pages:		30
URL:            https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-pce-hierarchy-extensions-06.txt
Status:         https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-hierarchy-extensions/
Htmlized:       https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-pce-hierarchy-extensions-06
Htmlized:       https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-pce-hierarchy-extensions
Diff:           https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-pce-hierarchy-extensions-06

Abstract:
   The Hierarchical Path Computation Element (H-PCE) architecture is
   defined in RFC 6805.  It provides a mechanism to derive an optimum
   end-to-end path in a multi-domain environment by using a hierarchical
   relationship between domains to select the optimum sequence of
   domains and optimum paths across those domains.

   This document defines extensions to the Path Computation Element
   Protocol (PCEP) to support Hierarchical PCE procedures.

Re: [Pce] New Version Notification for draft-ietf… daniel
Re: [Pce] New Version Notification for draft-ietf… Dhruv Dhody
Re: [Pce] New Version Notification for draft-ietf… daniel