Re: [Pce] New Version Notification for draft-ietf-pce-hierarchy-extensions-06.txt

<daniel@olddog.co.uk> Wed, 28 November 2018 20:31 UTC

Return-Path: <dk@danielking.net>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BD8F126DBF for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Nov 2018 12:31:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.357
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.357 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-1.459, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=danielking-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 93puNQ-JtKJr for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Nov 2018 12:31:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wr1-x42a.google.com (mail-wr1-x42a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::42a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FFC6127B4C for <pce@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Nov 2018 12:31:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wr1-x42a.google.com with SMTP id j2so27692940wrw.1 for <pce@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Nov 2018 12:31:15 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=danielking-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=sender:from:to:cc:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:thread-index :content-language; bh=mV1bAaTTFwMebINZ4hL1PXZNECMTjxLlkR+ppPsi4tc=; b=EzFp8vBrFw520X7HdPmgEW8wFPNeCxD9NmFKGFXtuuowZU4nZds6IXq2SlPZEXD7oP 3C3vZh+/R1JTkXpc8ny7Y3Z8HGIY5hWufRkgMI3ADVoPE/a8m5JRzxdfxMN+8YxYvTJO T8erc7qIPXaL8Q6LWg3Qjvytnq+s/nmsOvqx1VhleF+RVHJflKYzxgHGVXGDqzXmtSCq ob7J2zX7IyGQAYaEcNnictjPFyneMXZTnTnnYtujSnHSirBb2nAxJJH8VJF9txW2XKXL 1tgzPzpk+4B2V5eyceh5tC6qm/65nc5uXid9jwBg1Z0smnOqEE4Q4cyErGMJKULrM+CY IowQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:from:to:cc:references:in-reply-to:subject :date:message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:thread-index :content-language; bh=mV1bAaTTFwMebINZ4hL1PXZNECMTjxLlkR+ppPsi4tc=; b=CruQuPWDWXxrHo+NA1M312jmh9IJqvruyBoK8FPF9cU+HWg1nImEhOYDDQt4QPC18O USja3id8k0kW3G2J8c+BfZmnodMuwW8ermESH0Sl9cIG/3+HGrlQBdebveg8+SvLaEAT nT4EK6W+SGsJfBU3gYGsnz63wT5L5phPQBaYTyqU8L9sq7KL0uH/peefNd15g4Nt79r1 v0mqXiPHOfPm4gaq3cUcoMK3IdRLVwry/2UBzJAhhKw5EiC2JhZdiqeMkie0ZHqizS00 N7xGXMmFrSe4l/VtYGT6VQboiz+loq8D/lrJCYQ41P7adJV8b6zgiD04DrjAx6TaPtuh ikjw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AA+aEWZJqM4rIVEdBxDBcEyx6mNivthaVZuEF/3DIa4gFzEAKNxnQ7HV WClwXz/2npnAcANva7yCti8Ccw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AFSGD/UFraJia+ujvQPOejZKoScSfuSkFWwg8KDANVORbiFn4ZXOpqpFCnaXovLrZGwSofgJocH2FQ==
X-Received: by 2002:adf:81c4:: with SMTP id 62mr30843154wra.266.1543437073342; Wed, 28 Nov 2018 12:31:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from INARA ([82.138.197.10]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 198sm6210939wmj.38.2018.11.28.12.31.11 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 28 Nov 2018 12:31:12 -0800 (PST)
Sender: Daniel King <dk@danielking.net>
X-Google-Original-Sender: "Daniel King" <dk@danielking.net>
From: daniel@olddog.co.uk
To: 'Dhruv Dhody' <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com>
Cc: pce@ietf.org, 'Dhruv Dhody' <dhruv.dhody@huawei.com>
References: <154139213187.31948.2999497175670234417.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <000901d474c3$1bc6dfd0$53549f70$@olddog.co.uk> <CAB75xn4zkH5AAnv5tuPOUboq3QXCFrVLi2cOkC+sarPvxMCtWw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAB75xn4zkH5AAnv5tuPOUboq3QXCFrVLi2cOkC+sarPvxMCtWw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2018 20:31:12 -0000
Message-ID: <005f01d48759$4e2195d0$ea64c170$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: AQErx9+pWFJpHZZpHNVtKCyhtrdzFQFYHRkiAOCG0UampV1xYA==
Content-Language: en-gb
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/PK4F8uIFg0ozKz12HomH1w4QunA>
Subject: Re: [Pce] New Version Notification for draft-ietf-pce-hierarchy-extensions-06.txt
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2018 20:31:18 -0000

Excellent, thanks Dhruv. Let me get with the other authors and discuss. So far, I don’t see an issue. Thanks for the suggestions. 

BR, Dan. 

-----Original Message-----
From: Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com> 
Sent: 28 November 2018 15:16
To: Daniel King <daniel@olddog.co.uk>
Cc: pce@ietf.org; Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.dhody@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [Pce] New Version Notification for draft-ietf-pce-hierarchy-extensions-06.txt

Hi Daniel,

As the document shepherd, I have some suggested changes that I have made directly in the text file. Most of them are editorial in nature and some fixes issues with the last update. I have a few suggestions that I have put in the text file.

Diff: https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=draft-ietf-pce-hierarchy-extensions-06&url2=https://raw.githubusercontent.com/dhruvdhody-huawei/ietf/master/draft-ietf-pce-hierarchy-extensions-06-dd.txt

Hope you found this helpful, to merge directly into your working copy.
I have the shepherd report ready and we could move forward when you post an update. Also need to check with Adrian, if he is happy with the resolution of his comments.

Regards,
Dhruv

On Mon, Nov 5, 2018 at 10:19 AM <daniel@olddog.co.uk> wrote:
>
> Greetings PCE'rs,
>
> Please find a new version of draft-ietf-pce-hierarchy-extensions (version 06). Thanks to Adrian Farrel for his recent and thorough review, it helped the authors polish the I-D.
>
> Revisions to the new version of the I-D include:
>
> - Updated Abstract
> - Updated Introduction
> - Updated Security text
> - Added RFC7399 (Unanswered questions of the PCE) text and reference 
> to Introduction Scope
> - Consistency of "Objective Functions" text
> - Revised H-PCE-CAPABILITY TLV format and behavior
> - Cleaned up Section 3.3.1 OF Codes
> - Consistency of text and readability updates
> - Added IANA allocation policy to IANA Section
> - Implementation Status moved to an Appendix with statement that this 
> will be removed before publication
>
> There is one material change to protocol solution in the I-D. It is proposed that the H-PCE-CAPABILITY TLV should now use one flag (P-bit), instead of two. If set, will signal that the child PCE wishes to use the peer PCE as a parent PCE:
>
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-pce-hierarchy-extensions-06#pag
> e-8
>
> The authors will follow-up with Adrian, via the PCE list, and respond to his specific comments in a separate email.
>
> BR, Dan.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: internet-drafts@ietf.org <internet-drafts@ietf.org>
> Sent: 05 November 2018 11:29
> To: Oscar de Dios <ogondio@tid.es>; Daniel King <daniel@olddog.co.uk>; 
> Fatai Zhang <zhangfatai@huawei.com>; Oscar Gonzalez de Dios 
> <ogondio@tid.es>; Quintin Zhao <quintin.zhao@huawei.com>; 
> pce-chairs@ietf.org
> Subject: New Version Notification for 
> draft-ietf-pce-hierarchy-extensions-06.txt
>
>
> A new version of I-D, draft-ietf-pce-hierarchy-extensions-06.txt
> has been successfully submitted by Daniel King and posted to the IETF repository.
>
> Name:           draft-ietf-pce-hierarchy-extensions
> Revision:       06
> Title:          Extensions to Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) for Hierarchical Path Computation Elements (PCE)
> Document date:  2018-11-05
> Group:          pce
> Pages:          30
> URL:            https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-pce-hierarchy-extensions-06.txt
> Status:         https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-hierarchy-extensions/
> Htmlized:       https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-pce-hierarchy-extensions-06
> Htmlized:       https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-pce-hierarchy-extensions
> Diff:           https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-pce-hierarchy-extensions-06
>
> Abstract:
>    The Hierarchical Path Computation Element (H-PCE) architecture is
>    defined in RFC 6805.  It provides a mechanism to derive an optimum
>    end-to-end path in a multi-domain environment by using a hierarchical
>    relationship between domains to select the optimum sequence of
>    domains and optimum paths across those domains.
>
>    This document defines extensions to the Path Computation Element
>    Protocol (PCEP) to support Hierarchical PCE procedures.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pce mailing list
> Pce@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce