[Pce] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-rfc6006bis-03: (with COMMENT)

Mirja Kühlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net> Fri, 25 August 2017 13:49 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Mirja Kühlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-pce-rfc6006bis@ietf.org, Jonathan Hardwick <jonathan.hardwick@metaswitch.com>, pce-chairs@ietf.org, jonathan.hardwick@metaswitch.com, pce@ietf.org
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <150366896030.19613.18267092586923572032.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2017 06:49:20 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/3-Ux5BQdWGPH_w0H5HdYVuP0J0U>
Subject: [Pce] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-rfc6006bis-03: (with COMMENT)

Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-pce-rfc6006bis-03: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-rfc6006bis/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I could be helpful, also for implementors to update their code, to more
explicitly spell out what the changes are (in the intro) instead of just
listing the errata numbers.

[Pce] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-iet… Mirja Kühlewind
Re: [Pce] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft… Dhruv Dhody