IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Pce] I-D Action: draft-ietf-pce-sr-p2mp-policy-03.txt

Dhruv Dhody <dd@dhruvdhody.com> Fri, 10 March 2023 03:48 UTC

Return-Path: <dd@dhruvdhody.com>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B881C169539 for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Mar 2023 19:48:16 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.894
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.894 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=dhruvdhody-com.20210112.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id K7NgrWJPFM62 for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Mar 2023 19:48:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ua1-x932.google.com (mail-ua1-x932.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::932]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E88B4C15270B for <pce@ietf.org>; Thu, 9 Mar 2023 19:48:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ua1-x932.google.com with SMTP id x1so2667815uav.9 for <pce@ietf.org>; Thu, 09 Mar 2023 19:48:11 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=dhruvdhody-com.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112; t=1678420091; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=xwRhftjRxt6Pc41cLhzN1ZTgHTv1Noxt/ODSdcG38yw=; b=qs/amJjX/4IBgUd/XlQPiMerLwdyZ4/PWVdgRKKE4jNYe4npyoyf7dOOmIGpVPVXAp Z3W2rv4dqZeCOZ7JiyYNzWj0EOyArtfroFPNS/SR67j/KPm3ZzGAiClqrrRJq3JaBve+ BVBXsFvER2JNAv9Sfso8H3r9KyguElfRPky3p4g3fjzaGon9fG08aDXBlIJWQxC1VmBD VrsSSU4upmk3Tvm4VRSmaPSywkY8ouVj4qwqr+sPleSIWS/plH9ZZjKl9yWlbFZrRgEU ucS1zYm8wgyqJm8b7XgwSlbPOM+hoWnlQVl2riZj4y2q6FfE/IOYkDeTetJST+p6ntiq vftA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; t=1678420091; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=xwRhftjRxt6Pc41cLhzN1ZTgHTv1Noxt/ODSdcG38yw=; b=48x6LqUUmR+i7UnkidpITwM/xw//4ptqX7G/GdocVWk14Qts0dUstYaKSUZpFYo6cc H6xzQ8sAr9CKVpxLludvDIqJBX2kKnNLNx1x7pbsz28Gw4lTWpWq5vORjlqwLsAUDApb kKNt1t+om3ndQt7W9h2WALrCoVqx/uPesOFrFUtR8o/X9UutPQtFowfNZDRJi8H4cCpT vHSSButdNM0pDSGbNVmTtZvNQgRcIcRTR0GzEDIWiV6dmXgSh4UVFqMf0n8tMrY/dVQM K586einlb/CU0f67wFfeg+BnhNWsyMEr2fuq2jxFFScafIAoGBBcNugPunftCcefb91n 2v1w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AO0yUKWdp1tieJrfb7XiiWaBMYlcKxJ6/IBUp19xynlTEMeEdNhnHG9M iP60XHpIernqCN0JGZs1yqEm+/sACWIPvLEPoyXsAoAVD2TKqWWROwXdqw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AK7set/3jth+eWOEAbCHexS99bTnbH89YviafpZFn2QT7/4Yltz92z3q5bDcfWPp4kkFgDfGHzRhat74yB0Mhh1jLu4=
X-Received: by 2002:a1f:6d42:0:b0:401:b9fd:7053 with SMTP id i63-20020a1f6d42000000b00401b9fd7053mr15744144vkc.2.1678420090575; Thu, 09 Mar 2023 19:48:10 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <167839134474.24444.4654728106875545303@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <167839134474.24444.4654728106875545303@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Dhruv Dhody <dd@dhruvdhody.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2023 09:17:34 +0530
Message-ID: <CAP7zK5Ze0TN2vnyrdy_Rk6cSArr3nK7EbZ3wF96vXkO20LeK0w@mail.gmail.com>
To: draft-ietf-pce-sr-p2mp-policy@ietf.org
Cc: pce@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000048735f05f683a14f"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/4BrJ5sJP9ifq0jcAuUK09nFKzsc>
Subject: Re: [Pce] I-D Action: draft-ietf-pce-sr-p2mp-policy-03.txt
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2023 03:48:16 -0000

Hi,

Just one quick comment! I remember making this point earlier as well, and
if the WG disagrees please let me know!

I am not a fan of the format used by the examples in this I-D (which are in
the form of PCEP packet structures)  -
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-pce-sr-p2mp-policy-03#section-7.2
It might be useful for someone debugging (well we also have tools that do
that way better and show results in a much more friendly way), but not for
a general reader of an RFC.

You will also note that this is not the usual style followed in the PCE WG
document. P2MP RFCs have examples in past, my request would be to follow
the same style and not to deviate -
https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8623.html#section-6.6
https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8306.html#section-3.10

Thanks!
Dhruv (as a WG participant)



On Fri, Mar 10, 2023 at 1:19 AM <internet-drafts@ietf.org> wrote:

>
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
> directories.
> This Internet-Draft is a work item of the Path Computation Element WG of
> the IETF.
>
>         Title           : PCEP extensions for p2mp sr policy
>         Authors         : Hooman Bidgoli
>                           Daniel Voyer
>                           Saranya Rajarathinam
>                           Anuj Budhiraja
>                           Tarek Saad
>                           Siva Sivabalan
>   Filename        : draft-ietf-pce-sr-p2mp-policy-03.txt
>   Pages           : 44
>   Date            : 2023-03-09
>
> Abstract:
>    SR P2MP policies are set of policies that enable architecture for
>    P2MP service delivery.  This document specifies extensions to the
>    Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) that allow a
>    stateful PCE to compute and initiate P2MP paths from a Root to a set
>    of Leaves.
>
>
> The IETF datatracker status page for this Internet-Draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-sr-p2mp-policy/
>
> There is also an htmlized version available at:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-pce-sr-p2mp-policy-03
>
> A diff from the previous version is available at:
> https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-ietf-pce-sr-p2mp-policy-03
>
>
> Internet-Drafts are also available by rsync at rsync.ietf.org:
> :internet-drafts
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pce mailing list
> Pce@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email