Re: [Pce] Query on Usage of LSP Identifier TLV in SR

piggy backing on Dhruv email ...

During PCUpdate for SR LSP -  MBB process mentioned in
draft-tanaka-pce-stateful-pce-mbb applicable? The MBB draft has expired,
will it be incorporated in stateful-pce draft?

Thanks,
Girish

On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 10:58 PM, Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.dhody@huawei.com>
wrote:

> Hi Authors,
>
>
>
> In the stateful PCE draft [1], it says –
>
> The LSP Identifiers TLV MUST be included in the LSP object in PCRpt
>
> messages for RSVP-signaled LSPs.
>
>
>
> The SR draft [2] did not mention anything about LSP Identifier TLV.
>
> And in implementations that I am aware of, SR-TE LSP still uses the
> LSP-Identifier TLV. Is that correct? (I personally think so!!)
>
>
>
> If yes, do you think there is a need to update –
>
> -      [1] to say all LSPs (and not just RSVP-signaled).
>
> -      Or [2] to say that LSP-Identifier TLV are also applicable to SR
> and MUST be included.
>
>
>
> Thanks!
>
> Dhruv
>
>
>
>
>
> [1]
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-11#section-7.3.1
>
> [2] http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing/
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pce mailing list
> Pce@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
>
>