Re: [Pce] (My drafts are discussed in the mailing list) RE: Ask for time slots in IETF 81

JP Vasseur <jpv@cisco.com> Tue, 19 July 2011 15:27 UTC

Return-Path: <jpv@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9792621F8A4E for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Jul 2011 08:27:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -109.863
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-109.863 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.736, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id a03+Cym0EoQo for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Jul 2011 08:27:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ams-iport-2.cisco.com (ams-iport-2.cisco.com [144.254.224.141]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7599D21F873F for <pce@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Jul 2011 08:27:17 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=jpv@cisco.com; l=3570; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1311089237; x=1312298837; h=subject:mime-version:from:in-reply-to:date:cc: content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=EGMA/dbPxX+VK2hOEaJyLkDaUGw+cNRKuVhFHl8LmEM=; b=HZCmkTiyTTc17Q4E8apy3Xqz6NIrdRMXit84IOy6WjdMoajYcUHJuehX zrOO7oUhWXZaBj9/GWUNjhws6zp5tS8e7AK+sQFD8JXkXicadeNgQh7i7 Ctt+D09trZZ408cNiX3cPkqj5uv8PRfW1yARhhaj9LOY8ojF1kLphwVBE s=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AuIAALqhJU6Q/khN/2dsb2JhbABUmAiPRXeIfKVJnk6FXV8EkmeFDYtP
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.67,228,1309737600"; d="scan'208";a="43369177"
Received: from ams-core-4.cisco.com ([144.254.72.77]) by ams-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 19 Jul 2011 15:27:16 +0000
Received: from xbh-ams-101.cisco.com (xbh-ams-101.cisco.com [144.254.74.71]) by ams-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p6JFRGcY004998; Tue, 19 Jul 2011 15:27:16 GMT
Received: from xfe-ams-102.cisco.com ([144.254.231.94]) by xbh-ams-101.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Tue, 19 Jul 2011 17:27:16 +0200
Received: from ams-jvasseur-8912.cisco.com ([10.55.82.148]) by xfe-ams-102.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Tue, 19 Jul 2011 17:27:15 +0200
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: JP Vasseur <jpv@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <5316A0AB3C851246A7CA5758973207D404968FB0@dfweml503-mbx.china.huawei.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2011 17:27:14 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <272E65FB-AE85-4F06-8C13-231EF524CDEE@cisco.com>
References: <5316A0AB3C851246A7CA5758973207D404968FB0@dfweml503-mbx.china.huawei.com>
To: Huaimo Chen <huaimo.chen@huawei.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 19 Jul 2011 15:27:15.0891 (UTC) FILETIME=[56FC4030:01CC4628]
Cc: pce@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Pce] (My drafts are discussed in the mailing list) RE: Ask for time slots in IETF 81
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pce>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2011 15:27:18 -0000

Dear Huaimo,

Believe me, Julien and I spent a lot of time looking at each draft.
Bear in mind, that decisions at the IETF are made on mailing lists, the aim of meetings
is to discuss issues, that's all. Please use the mailing list and let's see if there is some
traction.

Thanks for your comprehension.

Kind Regards.

JP and Julien.

On Jul 19, 2011, at 5:24 PM, Huaimo Chen wrote:

> Hi JP,
> 
>    There are discussions about my IETF drafts on the PCE mailing list (I have just looked through the list).In addition, all my four IETF drafts are updated So please consider my requests for time slots in IETF 81 in Quebec again.
>    They follow the rules. The time slots should be allocated for them.
> 
> Best Regards,
> Huaimo
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Huaimo Chen 
> Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2011 10:17 AM
> To: 'JP Vasseur'
> Cc: Julien Meuric; Daniel King; pce@ietf.org
> Subject: RE: Ask for time slots in IETF 81
> 
> Hi JP,
> 
>    There are discussions on the mailing list for the following two drafts, and the drafts are updated according to some of the results of the discussions.
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-chen-pce-compute-backup-ingress/
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-chen-pce-compute-backup-egress/
>    Could you please allocate a slot for these drafts in IETF 81 in Quebec since these follows the rules?
> 
>    For the drafts
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-chen-pce-forward-search-p2p-path-computation/
> and 
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-chen-pce-forward-search-p2mp-path/
> There are lots of discussions about them after the last IETF presentation in Prague. The drafts are updated according to some of the comments and suggestions from the discussions. You and many others should have seen these discussions during and after the meeting.
>    I would like to request a time slot again to present and share the results with the WG in IETF 81 Quebec. 
>    The meeting of face to face with presentation in IETF should trigger discussions on the topic to be presented. The results of the discussions should be shared with WG in IETF again. So please consider my request for a slot to share the results of discussions with WG.
> 
> Best Regards,
> Huaimo
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: JP Vasseur [mailto:jpv@cisco.com] 
> Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2011 9:20 AM
> To: Huaimo Chen
> Cc: Julien Meuric; Daniel King; pce@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: Ask for time slots in IETF 81
> 
> Dear Huaimo,
> 
> On Jul 11, 2011, at 8:13 PM, Huaimo Chen wrote:
> 
>> Hi Julien, JP and Dan, 
>> 
>>   Could you please allocate three time slots for me as follows if possible?
>> 
>>     15 minutes for http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-chen-pce-forward-search-p2p-path-computation/
>> 
>>     15 minutes for http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-chen-pce-forward-search-p2mp-path/
>> 
>>     10 minutes for http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-chen-pce-compute-backup-ingress/
>> and
>> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-chen-pce-compute-backup-egress/
>> 
> 
> Thanks for your email. As explained in the other two emails, these drafts do fall into the same
> category of documents that were presented, without any further technical discussion on the 
> mailing list. Please start technical thread on the mailing list.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> JP and Julien.
> 
>> 
>> Best Regards,
>> Huaimo
>