[Pce] We welcome your comments and suggestions about it//FW: New Version Notification for draft-kondreddy-pce-frr-boundary-node-app-00.txt

KONDREDDY VENUGOPAL REDDY <venugopalreddyk@huawei.com> Wed, 18 July 2012 13:01 UTC

Return-Path: <venugopalreddyk@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64C6721F86DA for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Jul 2012 06:01:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EfBl2+qD9-sH for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Jul 2012 06:01:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dfwrgout.huawei.com (dfwrgout.huawei.com [206.16.17.72]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8848321F86D1 for <pce@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Jul 2012 06:01:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 172.18.9.243 (EHLO dfweml202-edg.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.9.243]) by dfwrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.2.3-GA FastPath) with ESMTP id AID04070; Wed, 18 Jul 2012 09:02:44 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from DFWEML408-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.193.5.134) by dfweml202-edg.china.huawei.com (172.18.9.108) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.3; Wed, 18 Jul 2012 06:00:31 -0700
Received: from SZXEML424-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.82.67.163) by dfweml408-hub.china.huawei.com (10.193.5.134) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.3; Wed, 18 Jul 2012 06:00:29 -0700
Received: from blrprnc09ns (10.18.96.98) by szxeml424-hub.china.huawei.com (10.82.67.163) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.323.3; Wed, 18 Jul 2012 21:00:24 +0800
From: KONDREDDY VENUGOPAL REDDY <venugopalreddyk@huawei.com>
To: pce@ietf.org
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 18:30:23 +0530
Message-ID: <000301cd64e5$4bb90f00$e32b2d00$@com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
Thread-Index: Ac1d4IBJTImivNrQRzGNnZ5SB0xFagG/qjLQ
Content-Language: en-us
X-Originating-IP: [10.18.96.98]
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Subject: [Pce] We welcome your comments and suggestions about it//FW: New Version Notification for draft-kondreddy-pce-frr-boundary-node-app-00.txt
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pce>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 13:01:55 -0000

Hi,

We have written a new draft about PCE's applicability and its role in boundary node protection. It has covered the aspects of finding merge point in case of facility backup for FRR in various cases and to compute bypass path. 
	It is complex for a point of local repair(PLR) node to find the merge point(MP) in case of boundary node protection, because the PLR doesn't have the full TED visibility.  And, It becomes more complicated to find merge point when confidentiality(path key) is enabled. Draft addresses about these cases. 

Request you to have a look at draft. We welcome your comments and suggestions.

Thanks.
Venu


-----Original Message-----
From: internet-drafts@ietf.org [mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org] 
Sent: Monday, July 09, 2012 8:08 PM
To: dhruv.dhody@huawei.com
Cc: venugopalreddyk@huawei.com
Subject: New Version Notification for draft-kondreddy-pce-frr-boundary-node-app-00.txt


A new version of I-D, draft-kondreddy-pce-frr-boundary-node-app-00.txt
has been successfully submitted by Dhruv Dhody and posted to the
IETF repository.

Filename:	 draft-kondreddy-pce-frr-boundary-node-app
Revision:	 00
Title:		 Applicability of Path Computation Element (PCE) for Fast Reroute (FRR) Boundary Node protection.
Creation date:	 2012-07-09
WG ID:		 Individual Submission
Number of pages: 14
URL:             http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-kondreddy-pce-frr-boundary-node-app-00.txt
Status:          http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-kondreddy-pce-frr-boundary-node-app
Htmlized:        http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-kondreddy-pce-frr-boundary-node-app-00


Abstract:
   Path computation element (PCE) can be used to compute a label
   switched path that spans across multiple domains.  This document
   explain the mechanism of Fast Re-Route (FRR) where a point of local
   repair (PLR) needs to find the appropriate merge point (MP) to do
   bypass path computation using PCE.  In case of boundary node
   protection when PCE confidentiality (path key) is enabled, new
   mechanisms are suggested in this document.

                                                                                  


The IETF Secretariat