Re: [Pce] Request for WG adoption of draft-li-pce-sr-path-segment-08

Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 20 August 2019 05:13 UTC

Return-Path: <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FADA1200C7; Mon, 19 Aug 2019 22:13:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gjTf1NHerW5L; Mon, 19 Aug 2019 22:13:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io1-xd2f.google.com (mail-io1-xd2f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d2f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 66B2D1200CC; Mon, 19 Aug 2019 22:13:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io1-xd2f.google.com with SMTP id j5so9512631ioj.8; Mon, 19 Aug 2019 22:13:08 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ePwjx4SbebOM2pbi/PFJrFO58hEMnGsSTaM7nrfTqOo=; b=gRDb7SmtivwaLyLgx5CCg9NBIVQrmgqUP/csJ8Y69kst2QcuRqtRgBQQoYRpCoCXTY NHyZ1V+Y4xVPQ0Yg93FJBxztz5yrzTClhpgaAjiw1kHFud168P9FHxeCh/gmcZvLD2V3 qzt6w8DkXftMBjhzsPosRGYb1GBFjAdhZfh371AOWls2JTy8ayLLzJfrm3wVaMnHO++r nP+3YB3LpueTx6depQPfOfapsQKtEo34jgsO352svkJwwF48+6D7A+7F/k5NLYmmWAIX +HhqGGPexrQLkTbLBOYYzwaJ1gMSbXmFLAz4qv60HLS4VuGiaLJTPCyEZ1zkn/R/3eqr jqLA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ePwjx4SbebOM2pbi/PFJrFO58hEMnGsSTaM7nrfTqOo=; b=Pkc93S8iF/g9cDryDBEw8vrIGdt56QdhWQw1Hxa1EWjCgGiFUcDO9+pUXsskRwvh02 0ENAwPpNjraO9XlSqAPge2GAFF5OR5H0iHwqj4oEm8oY3rjvO0yLviItXBpL4+28Thbp KaSz1k3nYRN5YeaY76S7+FKcEy6HvhtLc0uFvI3aib7c4Axd+iENvVkhwf26vJrB3gWi y6cxtjKeBBbITG1f9zHLis6xO5fNfULTFtz9RlBlAoOBq3Y1XzwztlY1O88y0OY1J1SS NfyKWPBYXxsLSBXXthgisJClC05RN1tbO0Ga5RAEOBslvdzQ4ijglwuMgwjQxYWLIfYw BW1w==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWCJzVvhtUhOU/LOivJ06/T7FF2nTeN1CxrpIZ3eYgCqmP/yhDf HeaIj6f2KKMb9urDK4P0OoB4q0pvS33wi8DfSRU=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzwmCOwVfoALUVXTqkyEoQDmFjlkgF5KKVsNcxm6/tp1X8ZAtCDIupq5zZL3DGCJgUMSB5Rzpc9lvtYd2r8kts=
X-Received: by 2002:a02:a405:: with SMTP id c5mr1747932jal.54.1566277987440; Mon, 19 Aug 2019 22:13:07 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <C7C2E1C43D652C4E9E49FE7517C236CB02684C0B@dggeml529-mbx.china.huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <C7C2E1C43D652C4E9E49FE7517C236CB02684C0B@dggeml529-mbx.china.huawei.com>
From: Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2019 10:42:31 +0530
Message-ID: <CAB75xn6Q7-3as969d4sSnaHXCwYfdjDBBuHiuoCMXtFu3FZX6w@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Chengli (Cheng Li)" <chengli13@huawei.com>
Cc: "pce@ietf.org" <pce@ietf.org>, pce-chairs <pce-chairs@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/7jIzweWBRjRLKQB56iPWO-K5Tgs>
Subject: Re: [Pce] Request for WG adoption of draft-li-pce-sr-path-segment-08
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2019 05:13:10 -0000

Hi Cheng,

Same response as the other draft :)

Thanks for the update and including the implementation status. Your
request for early code point is noted (and will be handled post
adoption). We will take this into consideration as we process the
adoption queue.

WG,

Please do not wait for the adoption call to review drafts, provide
comments to the authors early.

Check wiki for latest status - https://trac.ietf.org/trac/pce/wiki/WikiStart

Thanks!
Dhruv

On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 7:35 PM Chengli (Cheng Li) <chengli13@huawei.com> wrote:
>
> Hi WG and Chairs,
>
> We just updated the draft-li-pce-sr-path-segment. Major modifications:
>
>     * add Implementation Status
>     * move SRv6 related text to appendix
>     * add Security Considerations
>     * add Manageability Considerations
>
> Since the text is mature in this draft, we would like to ask for WG adoption for this draft (Though it has been waiting in WG adoption queue for a while.^-^)
>
> If possible, we would like to request IANA early allocation for helping implementation.
>
> Comments are welcome!
>
> Many thanks,
> Cheng
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: internet-drafts@ietf.org [mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org]
> Sent: Monday, August 19, 2019 9:54 PM
> To: Rakesh Gandhi <rgandhi@cisco.com>; Quan Xiong <xiong.quan@zte.com.cn>; Weiqiang Cheng <chengweiqiang@chinamobile.com>; Mach Chen <mach.chen@huawei.com>; Dongjie (Jimmy) <jie.dong@huawei.com>; Mach Chen <mach.chen@huawei.com>; Chengli (Cheng Li) <chengli13@huawei.com>; Lizhenbin <lizhenbin@huawei.com>
> Subject: New Version Notification for draft-li-pce-sr-path-segment-08.txt
>
>
> A new version of I-D, draft-li-pce-sr-path-segment-08.txt
> has been successfully submitted by Cheng Li and posted to the IETF repository.
>
> Name:           draft-li-pce-sr-path-segment
> Revision:       08
> Title:          Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) Extension for Path Segment in Segment Routing (SR)
> Document date:  2019-08-19
> Group:          Individual Submission
> Pages:          26
> URL:            https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-li-pce-sr-path-segment-08.txt
> Status:         https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-li-pce-sr-path-segment/
> Htmlized:       https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-li-pce-sr-path-segment-08
> Htmlized:       https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-li-pce-sr-path-segment
> Diff:           https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-li-pce-sr-path-segment-08
>
> Abstract:
>    The Path Computation Element (PCE) provides path computation
>    functions in support of traffic engineering in Multiprotocol Label
>    Switching (MPLS) and Generalized MPLS (GMPLS) networks.
>
>    The Source Packet Routing in Networking (SPRING) architecture
>    describes how Segment Routing (SR) can be used to steer packets
>    through an IPv6 or MPLS network using the source routing paradigm.  A
>    Segment Routed Path can be derived from a variety of mechanisms,
>    including an IGP Shortest Path Tree (SPT), explicit configuration, or
>    a Path Computation Element (PCE).
>
>    Path identification is needed for several use cases such as
>    performance measurement in Segment Routing (SR) network.  This
>    document specifies extensions to the Path Computation Element
>    Communication Protocol (PCEP) to support requesting, replying,
>    reporting and updating the Path Segment ID (Path SID) between PCEP
>    speakers.
>
>
>
>
> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
>
> The IETF Secretariat
>