IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Pce] WGLC for draft-ietf-pce-association-bidir

chen.ran@zte.com.cn Tue, 20 October 2020 01:47 UTC

Return-Path: <chen.ran@zte.com.cn>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71E113A0B39; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 18:47:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.884
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.884 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_KAM_HTML_FONT_INVALID=0.01, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id v2YMq5a3X6V2; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 18:47:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mxhk.zte.com.cn (mxhk.zte.com.cn [63.217.80.70]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 114A23A0B35; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 18:47:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mxct.zte.com.cn (unknown [192.168.164.215]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTPS id C9351F6F832F021CC67D; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 09:47:27 +0800 (CST)
Received: from mse-fl2.zte.com.cn (unknown [10.30.14.239]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTPS id A3738207A2A795B27097; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 09:47:27 +0800 (CST)
Received: from njxapp05.zte.com.cn ([10.41.132.204]) by mse-fl2.zte.com.cn with SMTP id 09K1lQuh055260; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 09:47:26 +0800 (GMT-8) (envelope-from chen.ran@zte.com.cn)
Received: from mapi (njxapp04[null]) by mapi (Zmail) with MAPI id mid203; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 09:47:26 +0800 (CST)
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2020 09:47:26 +0800
X-Zmail-TransId: 2afc5f8e41aeae8597fb
X-Mailer: Zmail v1.0
Message-ID: <202010200947263831709@zte.com.cn>
Mime-Version: 1.0
From: chen.ran@zte.com.cn
To: dd@dhruvdhody.com, pce@ietf.org, draft-ietf-pce-association-bidir@ietf.org, pce-chairs@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=====_001_next====="
X-MAIL: mse-fl2.zte.com.cn 09K1lQuh055260
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/A9I1JA3IlNhkirMdZ-_4GpgEhWU>
Subject: Re: [Pce] WGLC for draft-ietf-pce-association-bidir
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2020 01:47:34 -0000

Hi Chairs, WG,



I have read the latest version of the document and believe it is ready for publication.






Best Regards,


Ran


 



From: Dhruv Dhody

Date: 2020-10-06 01:46

To: pce

CC: draft-ietf-pce-association-bidir; pce-chairs

Subject: [Pce] WGLC for draft-ietf-pce-association-bidir




Hi WG,

 

This email starts a working group last call for

draft-ietf-pce-association-bidir [1].  Please indicate your support or

concern for this draft. If you are opposed to the progression of the

draft to RFC, please articulate your concern. If you support it,

please indicate that you have read the latest version and it is ready

for publication in your opinion. As always, review comments and nits

are most welcome. A general reminder to the WG to be more vocal during

the LC and adoption calls.

 

The WG LC will end on 20th October 2020.

 

Thanks,

Dhruv & Julien

[1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-association-bidir/

 

_______________________________________________

Pce mailing list

Pce@ietf.org

https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email