IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Pce] Reminder: Working Group last call on draft-ietf-pce-stateful-hpce-06

Ramon Casellas <ramon.casellas@cttc.es> Mon, 01 April 2019 07:46 UTC

Return-Path: <ramon.casellas@cttc.es>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 890EB120091 for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Apr 2019 00:46:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.888
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.888 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id e0pOIJACR2Xk for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Apr 2019 00:46:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx01.puc.rediris.es (outbound1mad.lav.puc.rediris.es [130.206.19.137]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7B245120086 for <pce@ietf.org>; Mon, 1 Apr 2019 00:46:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from leo.cttc.es (leo.cttc.es [84.88.62.208]) by mx01.puc.rediris.es with ESMTP id x317kSS8027093-x317kSSA027093 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=CAFAIL) for <pce@ietf.org>; Mon, 1 Apr 2019 09:46:28 +0200
Received: from [192.168.102.57] (unknown [192.168.102.57]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by leo.cttc.es (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0245E2014A for <pce@ietf.org>; Mon, 1 Apr 2019 09:46:27 +0200 (CEST)
To: pce@ietf.org
References: <00a101d4e85d$5604ba60$020e2f20$@olddog.co.uk>
From: Ramon Casellas <ramon.casellas@cttc.es>
Message-ID: <22dbb622-39e3-03bd-852f-f66d0880b1ad@cttc.es>
Date: Mon, 01 Apr 2019 09:46:26 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <00a101d4e85d$5604ba60$020e2f20$@olddog.co.uk>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------F7446E80C1AE4E629AC627EE"
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/Dz-7vu98lpLFhoet56gi0dgEryg>
Subject: Re: [Pce] Reminder: Working Group last call on draft-ietf-pce-stateful-hpce-06
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Apr 2019 07:46:35 -0000

Hi all

Apologies for the delay in my response.

I have read the draft, and I support its progression. In the framework 
of several research projects, we have been considering, implementing and 
testing stateful hierarchical PCE for optical networks and this draft 
describes the general considerations for the applicability of stateful 
HPCE in a multi-domain network.

I also think it is a good companion document to the work on ACTN being 
done in the TEAS WG

Best regards

Ramon


On 01/04/2019 9:34, Adrian Farrel wrote:
> So far you have all been very quiet.
>
> Thanks,
> Adrian
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Pce <pce-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Adrian Farrel
> Sent: 13 March 2019 22:01
> To: pce@ietf.org
> Subject: [Pce] Working Group last call on draft-ietf-pce-stateful-hpce-06
>
> Hi working group,
>
> This email starts a working group last call for
> draft-ietf-pce-stateful-hpce-06.
>
> I would like to hear messages of support or concern about this draft.
>
> If you support its progression towards publication as an RFC, please let us
> know that you have read the latest revision, and explain why you think the
> work is important. Indications of implementation would also be welcome -
> although this document is informational, I believe some people may have
> built stateful hierarchical PCEs for experimentation or deployment.
>
> If you are opposed to the progression or have concerns please articulate
> them.
>
> As always, review comments and nits are most welcome.
>
> Because of the effort that is going in to preparing for IETF-104 and because
> of the time spent away, this last call will run for three weeks and end on
> April 4th.
>
> Thanks,
> Adrian
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pce mailing list
> Pce@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pce mailing list
> Pce@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

-- 
Ramon Casellas, Ph.D. -- Senior Research Associate -- Networks Division
Optical Networks and Systems Department -- http://networks.cttc.es/ons
CTTC - Centre Tecnològic de Telecomunicacions de Catalunya
Parc Mediterrani de la Tecnologia (PMT) - Edifici B4
Av. Carl Friedrich Gauss, 7 - 08860 Castelldefels (Barcelona) - Spain
Tel.: +34 93 645 29 00 ext 2168-- Fax. +34 93 645 29 01

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email