Re: [Pce] Reminder: Working Group last call on draft-ietf-pce-stateful-hpce-06

Ricard Vilalta <ricard.vilalta@cttc.es> Mon, 01 April 2019 09:43 UTC

Return-Path: <ricard.vilalta@cttc.es>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F07BB1200D7 for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Apr 2019 02:43:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.889
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.889 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yky_5byjnvBl for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Apr 2019 02:43:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx01.puc.rediris.es (outbound1mad.lav.puc.rediris.es [130.206.19.138]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BDADC1200CE for <pce@ietf.org>; Mon, 1 Apr 2019 02:43:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from leo.cttc.es (leo.cttc.es [84.88.62.208]) by mx01.puc.rediris.es with ESMTP id x319hJTQ026367-x319hJTS026367 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=CAFAIL) for <pce@ietf.org>; Mon, 1 Apr 2019 11:43:19 +0200
Received: from [10.1.16.59] (pcrvilalta.cttc.es [10.1.16.59]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by leo.cttc.es (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1412F2014A for <pce@ietf.org>; Mon, 1 Apr 2019 11:43:19 +0200 (CEST)
To: pce@ietf.org
References: <00a101d4e85d$5604ba60$020e2f20$@olddog.co.uk>
From: Ricard Vilalta <ricard.vilalta@cttc.es>
Message-ID: <27999814-413e-66aa-2917-aeb2ad8034fd@cttc.es>
Date: Mon, 01 Apr 2019 11:43:20 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <00a101d4e85d$5604ba60$020e2f20$@olddog.co.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/HN3u15s8Ra9zFqpYKNgeOGyylns>
Subject: Re: [Pce] Reminder: Working Group last call on draft-ietf-pce-stateful-hpce-06
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Apr 2019 09:43:25 -0000

Hi Adrian,

Sorry for being late.

This draft has been useful when implementing ACTN framework in some 
demonstrations. I think that this draft should go to the next level.

BR,

Ricard

On 01/04/2019 9:34, Adrian Farrel wrote:
> So far you have all been very quiet.
>
> Thanks,
> Adrian
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Pce <pce-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Adrian Farrel
> Sent: 13 March 2019 22:01
> To: pce@ietf.org
> Subject: [Pce] Working Group last call on draft-ietf-pce-stateful-hpce-06
>
> Hi working group,
>
> This email starts a working group last call for
> draft-ietf-pce-stateful-hpce-06.
>
> I would like to hear messages of support or concern about this draft.
>
> If you support its progression towards publication as an RFC, please let us
> know that you have read the latest revision, and explain why you think the
> work is important. Indications of implementation would also be welcome -
> although this document is informational, I believe some people may have
> built stateful hierarchical PCEs for experimentation or deployment.
>
> If you are opposed to the progression or have concerns please articulate
> them.
>
> As always, review comments and nits are most welcome.
>
> Because of the effort that is going in to preparing for IETF-104 and because
> of the time spent away, this last call will run for three weeks and end on
> April 4th.
>
> Thanks,
> Adrian
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pce mailing list
> Pce@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pce mailing list
> Pce@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce