IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Pce] Working Group last call on draft-ietf-pce-stateful-hpce-06

Satish K <satish.ietf@gmail.com> Mon, 01 April 2019 08:40 UTC

Return-Path: <satish.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14CE31200CE for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Apr 2019 01:40:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qhKmyG0BCQ7T for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Apr 2019 01:40:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-it1-x131.google.com (mail-it1-x131.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::131]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44BAD1200C3 for <pce@ietf.org>; Mon, 1 Apr 2019 01:40:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-it1-x131.google.com with SMTP id n78so2957988itb.4 for <pce@ietf.org>; Mon, 01 Apr 2019 01:40:25 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=TTRgW6WrdHTzLV7mghp/O5zQa32vA+mhR16lwkkjZD4=; b=BKzX3Xu2rom/A5qVNYADJz7f267WSfA5a/DNGdLhsEhhyC3eajx/zKZFb7ryDDqgIp DYBr5f7xoteHMiI0IoaGZuTmbXq5I5wyvYt4+fim9pzMGpWqmPozOy8NUjiYJ92jpQdc 9ufQGZQlNR0B6Cfsht6FehIO6adOkjiLh4OFtGLCRiV/xtICZBiLLvWExaGIisixwdw0 79lk0+wOiKuEHuNcQhg1cBR6zm+g1tiiVqA/PcdvPkIwEJxQm4tu+hf4o6Npvj7skQTb Mzgc4VjV6DGbBXi6LCYfHbmAUIsX1aKnQahk1uaEQzwHO6zi21CLCwZTPCKPAdnZTrpf r5Fg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=TTRgW6WrdHTzLV7mghp/O5zQa32vA+mhR16lwkkjZD4=; b=nQFZTSk25QxCB3FvibvVtKGFpZ69kuhNIsaA2iVH0Gzf/Pgce2JSKBsERX2E94rBcE AfjuuJQ34H4nK2f/41Q4a8vJ5utDgAzdpDljKbdPYlsZ8oA7K5wZV2gwnGhbnuoKMAdv 32l3oZwyP6ibo8Xp21TfyUYmLfpLMyQJ7Qn9kJ5+HpxeKoqwHymsLSRniww8LjoAdNTl mMlZ4sUTyeQKmosgsdJwl6iN4/LlOulGFR48anvZgSbOhhJV6+oUWKs/rIZv41hLXZDi aeQDXPg+VEhjk64hjb4CS8R6CdEvjeE3SiGGC2CDn0u5oeqahUbN63oC0pO/uLB7SGZ6 LcVQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXlQtRCgiH33Of53QDn6b1IXahaXvz9B9cYGLDO80GW4SKHM+E0 JCkHCJz/v3WX2FMG13jPCdKudhzLnnZfOOvibok=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxk/C2PIbdzwh43goiNEJ0x7PU1mp/r5jIsVNJThPIcNSV3O9EERODUuXIH3AmWfoA1ORwaRJarI0tn428Bdq0=
X-Received: by 2002:a02:938f:: with SMTP id z15mr7080497jah.108.1554108024519; Mon, 01 Apr 2019 01:40:24 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <02a601d4d9e8$4def3770$e9cda650$@olddog.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <02a601d4d9e8$4def3770$e9cda650$@olddog.co.uk>
From: Satish K <satish.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 01 Apr 2019 14:10:13 +0530
Message-ID: <CABfSohGyqLp9dCCHKcdhT=sF4ub0gwJPqHxHB9QydFH4_ZqNmQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
Cc: pce@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000be7f2c058573f8be"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/hN04DOqsAzAOjHVPWORnQPveFqk>
Subject: Re: [Pce] Working Group last call on draft-ietf-pce-stateful-hpce-06
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Apr 2019 08:40:27 -0000

Hi WG,

We have implemented H-PCE in our ACTN Solution and implemented few features
of it in IETF-97 Hackathon.
Also the E2E solution of ACTN using H-PCE is showcased during Bits-n-Bytes
as well.

So i am very much interested and looking forward to see this draft is
getting published.

Thanks & Regards,
Satish Karunanithi

On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 3:31 AM Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk> wrote:

> Hi working group,
>
> This email starts a working group last call for
> draft-ietf-pce-stateful-hpce-06.
>
> I would like to hear messages of support or concern about this draft.
>
> If you support its progression towards publication as an RFC, please let us
> know that you have read the latest revision, and explain why you think the
> work is important. Indications of implementation would also be welcome -
> although this document is informational, I believe some people may have
> built stateful hierarchical PCEs for experimentation or deployment.
>
> If you are opposed to the progression or have concerns please articulate
> them.
>
> As always, review comments and nits are most welcome.
>
> Because of the effort that is going in to preparing for IETF-104 and
> because
> of the time spent away, this last call will run for three weeks and end on
> April 4th.
>
> Thanks,
> Adrian
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pce mailing list
> Pce@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email