IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Pce] Working Group last call on draft-ietf-pce-stateful-hpce-06

"Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Wed, 13 March 2019 22:01 UTC

Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD8271311E8 for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Mar 2019 15:01:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qkC5ISDChMmL for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Mar 2019 15:01:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mta6.iomartmail.com (mta6.iomartmail.com [62.128.193.156]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 416C212796C for <pce@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Mar 2019 15:01:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vs3.iomartmail.com (vs3.iomartmail.com [10.12.10.124]) by mta6.iomartmail.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id x2DM1St1001172 for <pce@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Mar 2019 22:01:28 GMT
Received: from vs3.iomartmail.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 840AB2203A for <pce@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Mar 2019 22:01:28 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from asmtp1.iomartmail.com (unknown [10.12.10.248]) by vs3.iomartmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6F32722032 for <pce@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Mar 2019 22:01:28 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from LAPTOPK7AS653V ([87.112.237.8]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp1.iomartmail.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id x2DM1Q3q024567 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for <pce@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Mar 2019 22:01:27 GMT
Reply-To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: pce@ietf.org
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2019 22:01:23 -0000
Organization: Old Dog Consulting
Message-ID: <02a601d4d9e8$4def3770$e9cda650$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: AdTZ53y9WbWjgHFiTrWATWWbUpSffQ==
Content-Language: en-gb
X-Originating-IP: 87.112.237.8
X-Thinkmail-Auth: adrian@olddog.co.uk
X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSVA-9.0.0.1623-8.2.0.1013-24488.003
X-TM-AS-Result: No--8.546-10.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--8.546-10.0-31-10
X-TMASE-Version: IMSVA-9.0.0.1623-8.2.1013-24488.003
X-TMASE-Result: 10--8.546500-10.000000
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: VZz6+2A6wpoX8+K+77XxXamukiZOfPi2QPCWRE0Lo8IWug0bekn/30nd YtosAwL4JaVXJb4ySQze7FARXhOmf4XVLLOFXnez+mHRL3uzOiKZf5btvM85AWDdsQGY1D47Msq 8MEuZsEu5EDOov8VpcRKw15oDKpL+GAdnzrnkM485f9Xw/xqKXVsKO+9Zlb5JRDqt5ITpO0YUGm 4zriL0oQtuKBGekqUpI/NGWt0UYPAxZNm/LvNMRSFUp4YbxOrAhiH8eTNlcUJXhvEtYXHAb0UeI a84g67X
X-TMASE-SNAP-Result: 1.821001.0001-0-1-12:0,22:0,33:0,34:0-0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/3Iaf4UgaotHYxkv1m88iArpYcvc>
Subject: [Pce] Working Group last call on draft-ietf-pce-stateful-hpce-06
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2019 22:01:34 -0000

Hi working group,

This email starts a working group last call for
draft-ietf-pce-stateful-hpce-06.

I would like to hear messages of support or concern about this draft.

If you support its progression towards publication as an RFC, please let us
know that you have read the latest revision, and explain why you think the
work is important. Indications of implementation would also be welcome -
although this document is informational, I believe some people may have
built stateful hierarchical PCEs for experimentation or deployment.

If you are opposed to the progression or have concerns please articulate
them.

As always, review comments and nits are most welcome.

Because of the effort that is going in to preparing for IETF-104 and because
of the time spent away, this last call will run for three weeks and end on
April 4th.

Thanks,
Adrian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email