IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Pce] Adoption Poll for draft-lazzeri-pce-residual-bw

Julien Meuric <julien.meuric@orange.com> Thu, 13 December 2018 13:06 UTC

Return-Path: <julien.meuric@orange.com>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E4C912F18C for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Dec 2018 05:06:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_FAIL=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xHKutY1bFWUl for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Dec 2018 05:06:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from p-mail-ext.rd.orange.com (p-mail-ext.rd.orange.com [161.106.1.9]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAAEB128CFD for <pce@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Dec 2018 05:06:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from p-mail-ext.rd.orange.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 9BD175615AA for <pce@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Dec 2018 14:05:43 +0100 (CET)
Received: from p-mail-int.rd.francetelecom.fr (p-mail-int.rd.francetelecom.fr [10.192.117.12]) by p-mail-ext.rd.orange.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15F8156141A for <pce@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Dec 2018 14:05:15 +0100 (CET)
Received: from p-mail-int.rd.francetelecom.fr (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 84F6F1817CA for <pce@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Dec 2018 14:05:17 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [10.193.71.36] (l-at13891.rd.francetelecom.fr [10.193.71.36]) by p-mail-int.rd.francetelecom.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63886181285 for <pce@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Dec 2018 14:05:17 +0100 (CET)
To: "pce@ietf.org" <pce@ietf.org>
From: Julien Meuric <julien.meuric@orange.com>
Organization: Orange
Message-ID: <4ddabd6a-1e36-cc3e-cef8-3aa03734125d@orange.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2018 14:05:17 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.2.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
X-PMX-Version: 6.4.6.2792898, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.2.2107409, Antispam-Data: 2018.12.13.125716, AntiVirus-Engine: 5.56.0, AntiVirus-Data: 2018.12.13.5560001
X-PMX-Spam: Gauge=X, Probability=10%, Report=' TO_IN_SUBJECT 0.5, HTML_00_01 0.05, HTML_00_10 0.05, BODYTEXTP_SIZE_3000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_1000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_2000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_5000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_7000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_700_799 0, SINGLE_URI_IN_BODY 0, URI_WITH_PATH_ONLY 0, __ANY_URI 0, __CP_URI_IN_BODY 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __HAS_FROM 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __HTTPS_URI 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_TEXT_P 0, __MIME_TEXT_P1 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __MOZILLA_USER_AGENT 0, __NO_HTML_TAG_RAW 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __SINGLE_URI_TEXT 0, __TO_IN_SUBJECT 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __TO_NAME 0, __TO_NO_NAME 0, __URI_IN_BODY 0, __URI_NOT_IMG 0, __URI_NO_MAILTO 0, __URI_NO_WWW 0, __URI_NS , __URI_WITH_PATH 0, __USER_AGENT 0'
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/I4TOE47uNv8oTcQxFCF2gupVd9o>
Subject: [Pce] Adoption Poll for draft-lazzeri-pce-residual-bw
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2018 13:06:03 -0000

Dear WG,

We discussed about draft-lazzeri-pce-residual-bw a couple of times
during past IETF meetings. At that time, those in the room who had read
it looked quite interested, but they were just a few. We now request a
feedback from the list: do you support the adoption of
draft-lazzeri-pce-residual-bw as a starting point for a PCE work item?
(https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-lazzeri-pce-residual-bw-01)

Please respond to the list, including your reasons if you do not support.

Thanks

Julien


P.S.: We are aware that the latest version of the I-D has expired, but
an adoption would solve that and a lack of interest may help the authors
focus their effort on something else than a simple timer reset.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email