[Pce] Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-rfc6006bis-03: (with COMMENT)

[Benoit Claise <[e-mail]>]

Benoit Claise has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-pce-rfc6006bis-03: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-rfc6006bis/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

- Where is the "diff from RFC6006" section?
The following is not useful:

       This document obsoletes RFC 6006 and incorporates all outstanding
       Errata:

       o Erratum with IDs: 3819, 3830, 3836, 4867, and 4868.

I found "Appendix A. Summary of the RBNF Changes from RFC 6006", as a good
start, but it doesn't even appear in the table of content. Why?

- I've not been following the IPR situation (as described by Alvaro), but would
like to understand and it should be discussed during the telechat. Is it the
case that https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/1686/ (related to RFC6006) is
updated by https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2983/ (related to RFC6006 and
RFC6006bis)?