[Pce] stateful-HPCE

Leeyoung <leeyoung@huawei.com> Thu, 21 July 2016 16:00 UTC

Return-Path: <leeyoung@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A29A312D77E for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 09:00:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.507
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.507 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HK_RANDOM_ENVFROM=0.001, HK_RANDOM_FROM=0.999, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.287, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id POmoQ5_bgByG for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 09:00:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 21C5512D782 for <pce@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 09:00:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml702-cah.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id COC19932; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 16:00:09 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from DFWEML701-CAH.china.huawei.com (10.193.5.175) by lhreml702-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.99) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.235.1; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 16:58:51 +0100
Received: from DFWEML501-MBX.china.huawei.com ([10.193.5.178]) by dfweml701-cah.china.huawei.com ([10.193.5.175]) with mapi id 14.03.0235.001; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 08:58:45 -0700
From: Leeyoung <leeyoung@huawei.com>
To: "pce@ietf.org" <pce@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: stateful-HPCE
Thread-Index: AdHjaMHG+VCCQyZ0TtaiffDL8lvYEQ==
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2016 15:58:45 +0000
Message-ID: <7AEB3D6833318045B4AE71C2C87E8E172A8AC8E3@dfweml501-mbx>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.200.216.160]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_7AEB3D6833318045B4AE71C2C87E8E172A8AC8E3dfweml501mbx_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
X-Mirapoint-Virus-RAPID-Raw: score=unknown(0), refid=str=0001.0A090204.5790F189.00C4, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0, ip=0.0.0.0, so=2013-06-18 04:22:30, dmn=2013-03-21 17:37:32
X-Mirapoint-Loop-Id: d2cfd80e096323bde0f88dfddde57c6c
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/T0pv2oXhyNoRT1SnJ7F7xMgTk9E>
Subject: [Pce] stateful-HPCE
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2016 16:00:18 -0000

Hi PCE WG,

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dhodylee-pce-stateful-hpce/

We'd like to solicit WG's comment on this draft. As Dhruv presented today in the PCE WG meeting, this draft does not add any new protocol work. It is informational only and the co-authors believe this draft can move to the next step.

Thanks in advance for your comments, suggestions, etc for this draft.

Young (on behalf of co-authors and contributors).