Re: [Pce] Early code point allocation for draft-ietf-pce-local-protection-enforcement

Dhruv Dhody <dd@dhruvdhody.com> Tue, 26 January 2021 12:56 UTC

Return-Path: <dd@dhruvdhody.com>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED4B03A0AFB for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Jan 2021 04:56:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.003
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.003 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=dhruvdhody-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LAK2-cnkDFeX for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Jan 2021 04:56:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pl1-x62c.google.com (mail-pl1-x62c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::62c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 256A43A0AF8 for <pce@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Jan 2021 04:56:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pl1-x62c.google.com with SMTP id r4so9705218pls.11 for <pce@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Jan 2021 04:56:01 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=dhruvdhody-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=3A8Hnsx9rLwYifWzYNuBSoC8qjTOt9VJrrAhdCMl8D0=; b=0gU+TYCvL6LE/gU7vLWZA2Gvi4I1k8SYm2J89I8fjSzrWujYFqklaOT6dtgsCZWaFi SJ0xrUKehBhMM79beSrkQU/wykw9nrokJ/t/0TLibNmulCAP+yom18D1zsToCBFPkeAY /1FJwFSnK0baZEye0qPyskf/F89k5XKEKuQQic/1lwLVnlNdhBASjc1KXJcH9h8l1gQa yfJxeJRBFVOX5+RZwSoGmEY6lsf/QIKdTp1H48V5cQswR8x8V8Tcpl4uTsjxCSYeKyKQ HY0du+ztkioUt+oUGjbOHneSZKA422bZiL0XWzWZ45dSbIiwvqdDj3TTOLZ1t4GsVeuT vIRA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=3A8Hnsx9rLwYifWzYNuBSoC8qjTOt9VJrrAhdCMl8D0=; b=Kjw82bJqW7R5HYsgKkXpLcYw6GEYglpTmMqttnX8opHSzNn6lIWH6Q+GQVnKxz+Pd5 zVXxGealcOU6ziu64YoynLejv35v6YLEONfOIs9LzMNTqwOMrKpgam93iO9BfaNsUSab reDePg98FMH7hgLa2LP3WwoCBBMoVQwxuscCVrGAcIoUjwYC/wQBC6twtUoloL6r87xP lAyly0qd0Yt1QZDKzby2tgAhSAo0c2qQUfvfTVTyuzBPvcm6oGkiKSG1VSYFA3WTW705 CrgKwvLaic4XjAdee2Z7tdn4z898/SezGEa4MCSTttnS8fhwkYHY8FnzbZhEmWcmqQp3 gl7Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531AFysgbLnqUcGd7eecCEfALqRPOEqBuwXyLo9zX2aBHT3KyAm1 mexJuAtWsd0qP5iqY4Z4PM0GfUgMBFwQcv8a4cfuCkz508GhrEnl
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJydCj4lB0x4pKvwmdkXv/wK6pId70nT+TNfnAWGd+um03s58RMfDEzu6LvXSDmRJuibAcKODeXz0H1CcGC391c=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:4314:: with SMTP id q20mr6180754pjg.87.1611665761220; Tue, 26 Jan 2021 04:56:01 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAP7zK5ZbOpSkvRT7xGp-RdhfqX9jXBsn77H-6AD4prEvazx5Yg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAP7zK5ZbOpSkvRT7xGp-RdhfqX9jXBsn77H-6AD4prEvazx5Yg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Dhruv Dhody <dd@dhruvdhody.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2021 18:25:25 +0530
Message-ID: <CAP7zK5aRkj4Hy6o0J662hJzdqhB10_KOT19MrFwJNRKWUZ9O0w@mail.gmail.com>
To: pce@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/VLawQ83oxuAJbXZzIlZDzlJcKXo>
Subject: Re: [Pce] Early code point allocation for draft-ietf-pce-local-protection-enforcement
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2021 12:56:04 -0000

Hi WG,

As we have not received any objection, we consider that we have a
consensus on this early codepoint allocation. We are thus going to
proceed with the request.

Thanks,
Dhruv & Julien

On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 8:16 PM Dhruv Dhody <dd@dhruvdhody.com> wrote:
>
> Hi WG,
>
> We have received a request from the authors of
> draft-ietf-pce-local-protection-enforcement for an early code point allocation.
>
> RFC 7120 requires to meet the following criteria to proceed:
>
>    b.  The format, semantics, processing, and other rules related to
>        handling the protocol entities defined by the code points
>        (henceforth called "specifications") must be adequately described
>        in an Internet-Draft.
>    c.  The specifications of these code points must be stable; i.e., if
>        there is a change, implementations based on the earlier and later
>        specifications must be seamlessly interoperable.
>
> If anyone believes that the draft does not meet these criteria, or
> believes that early allocation is not appropriate for any other
> reason, please send an email to the PCE mailing list explaining the
> reasons.  If the chairs hear no objections by Monday, Jan 25th, we
> will kick off the early allocation request.
>
> Thanks!
> Dhruv & Julien