IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Pce] Alvaro Retana's No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-stateful-sync-optimizations-09: (with COMMENT)

"BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A" <db3546@att.com> Wed, 15 March 2017 17:05 UTC

Return-Path: <db3546@att.com>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9E8B131710; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 10:05:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.396
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.396 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-2.796, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9YmaqFmXB-HB; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 10:05:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0a-00191d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-00191d01.pphosted.com [67.231.157.136]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 815521316AA; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 10:05:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0049458.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by m0049458.ppops.net-00191d01. (8.16.0.17/8.16.0.17) with SMTP id v2FGtCXa028517; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 13:05:29 -0400
Received: from alpi155.enaf.aldc.att.com (sbcsmtp7.sbc.com [144.160.229.24]) by m0049458.ppops.net-00191d01. with ESMTP id 2979ed2cr0-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 15 Mar 2017 13:05:28 -0400
Received: from enaf.aldc.att.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by alpi155.enaf.aldc.att.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v2FH5RIh024394; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 13:05:28 -0400
Received: from mlpi407.sfdc.sbc.com (mlpi407.sfdc.sbc.com [130.9.128.239]) by alpi155.enaf.aldc.att.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v2FH5KpU024262 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 15 Mar 2017 13:05:26 -0400
Received: from MISOUT7MSGHUBAD.ITServices.sbc.com (MISOUT7MSGHUBAD.itservices.sbc.com [130.9.129.148]) by mlpi407.sfdc.sbc.com (RSA Interceptor); Wed, 15 Mar 2017 17:05:05 GMT
Received: from MISOUT7MSGUSRDE.ITServices.sbc.com ([169.254.5.162]) by MISOUT7MSGHUBAD.ITServices.sbc.com ([130.9.129.148]) with mapi id 14.03.0319.002; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 13:05:05 -0400
From: "BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A" <db3546@att.com>
To: "Alvaro Retana (aretana)" <aretana@cisco.com>, "adrian@olddog.co.uk" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>, 'The IESG' <iesg@ietf.org>
CC: "pce@ietf.org" <pce@ietf.org>, "pce-chairs@ietf.org" <pce-chairs@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-pce-stateful-sync-optimizations@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-pce-stateful-sync-optimizations@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Pce] Alvaro Retana's No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-stateful-sync-optimizations-09: (with COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHSnCkxfG1ykSx8z02QkdlFZ1mTsKGTjZcAgAALHoCAAocvQA==
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2017 17:05:05 +0000
Message-ID: <F64C10EAA68C8044B33656FA214632C85DE9AB76@MISOUT7MSGUSRDE.ITServices.sbc.com>
References: <148943037921.9243.15715481484070651192.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <02ef01d29c41$70f69060$52e3b120$@olddog.co.uk> <ECFA6603-D2E5-47D1-9817-58E2CD8BD939@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <ECFA6603-D2E5-47D1-9817-58E2CD8BD939@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [130.10.228.201]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-RSA-Inspected: yes
X-RSA-Classifications: public
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:, , definitions=2017-03-15_06:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_policy_notspam policy=outbound_policy score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1011 lowpriorityscore=0 impostorscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1702020001 definitions=main-1703150128
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/YaOTYN-o96KSXO3sXV4pJBVoe84>
Subject: Re: [Pce] Alvaro Retana's No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-stateful-sync-optimizations-09: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2017 17:05:34 -0000

Hi all,

After digging out from snow yesterday and some off-line discussion digging, here's an update for the IESG.

For this draft, we will retain the text as is, with the RECOMMENDED and the informative reference to draft-ietf-pcep-pceps.

Background info:

- this draft does not update any previous pce document on their recommendations for security. This document is referencing pce-stateful-pce which references RFC5440. The "RECOMMENDED" is in support of a new capability defined in this draft, speaker-entity-id. As it is a "RECOMMENDED" and not a "MUST", the reference is appropriately Informative.
- there is no need to hold this document until pceps is progressed. Pceps is an additional way to do security for RFC5440. PCEP (and this document) may operate with or without PCEPS.
- as this document normatively references RFC5440, when folks refer to RFC5440, they will also get the update for pceps.

Thanks,
Deborah


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Pce [mailto:pce-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Alvaro Retana (aretana)
> Sent: Monday, March 13, 2017 6:13 PM
> To: adrian@olddog.co.uk; 'The IESG' <iesg@ietf.org>
> Cc: pce@ietf.org; pce-chairs@ietf.org; draft-ietf-pce-stateful-sync-
> optimizations@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Pce] Alvaro Retana's No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-stateful-sync-
> optimizations-09: (with COMMENT)
> 
> On 3/13/17, 5:33 PM, "iesg on behalf of Adrian Farrel" <iesg-bounces@ietf.org
> on behalf of adrian@olddog.co.uk> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> > Ideally, everyone just gets on with it and the security update is handled by
> 
> > draft-ietf-pce-pceps.
> 
> 
> 
> I agree.  That security update doesn’t belong in this document.
> 
> 
> 
> Alvaro.
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Pce mailing list
> Pce@ietf.org
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-
> 3A__www.ietf.org_mailman_listinfo_pce&d=DwIGaQ&c=LFYZ-
> o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=6UhGpW9lwi9dM7jYlxXD8w&m=EbtjkuYlaNR3zleQwr
> 7LKJpaol49I5ZQ7HdLhn-
> jh54&s=JZdG8WaaKkquKV_CQfa0_PjXlKu44wDbOG8VaryGhck&e=

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email