Re: [Pce] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8306 (5622)

<daniel@olddog.co.uk> Mon, 04 February 2019 21:10 UTC

Sender: Daniel King <dk@danielking.net>
From: daniel@olddog.co.uk
To: db3546@att.com, aretana.ietf@gmail.com, martin.vigoureux@nokia.com
Cc: adrian@olddog.co.uk, pce@ietf.org, dhruv.ietf@gmail.com, julien.meuric@orange.com, quintin.zhao@huawei.com, ramanjaneya.palleti@huawei.com
References: <20190204170740.EAD22B82649@rfc-editor.org>
In-Reply-To: <20190204170740.EAD22B82649@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2019 21:10:27 -0000
Message-ID: <010801d4bcce$0e15edb0$2a41c910$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Thread-Index: AQKYA4H6KqVmNTiclZ1jkNvoxlLl7qRJlGUA
Content-Language: en-gb
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/mdnl-wIOQFr8UEezW6_G08j2Olk>
Subject: Re: [Pce] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8306 (5622)
Precedence: list

Hi ADs, 

Yes, as one of the authors, I confirm this was a glitch in the edit. The Errata Report raised should be accepted.

BR, Dan. 

-----Original Message-----
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> 
Sent: 04 February 2019 17:08
To: quintin.zhao@huawei.com; dhruv.ietf@gmail.com; ramanjaneya.palleti@huawei.com; daniel@olddog.co.uk; db3546@att.com; aretana.ietf@gmail.com; martin.vigoureux@nokia.com; adrian@olddog.co.uk; dhruv.ietf@gmail.com; julien.meuric@orange.com
Cc: adrian@olddog.co.uk; pce@ietf.org; rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Subject: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8306 (5622)

The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8306,
"Extensions to the Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) for Point-to-Multipoint Traffic Engineering Label Switched Paths".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5622

--------------------------------------
Type: Technical
Reported by: Adrian FARREL <adrian@olddog.co.uk>

Section: 3.13

Original Text
-------------
   The total PCEP message length, including the common header, is
   16 bytes.

Corrected Text
--------------
   The total PCEP message length, including the common header, is
   (2^16)-1 bytes.

Notes
-----
The message length field is 16 bits, so the maximum message length is (2^16)-1.

Instructions:
-------------
This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party  
can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 

--------------------------------------
RFC8306 (draft-ietf-pce-rfc6006bis-04)
--------------------------------------
Title               : Extensions to the Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) for Point-to-Multipoint Traffic Engineering Label Switched Paths
Publication Date    : November 2017
Author(s)           : Q. Zhao, D. Dhody, Ed., R. Palleti, D. King
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : Path Computation Element
Area                : Routing
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG

[Pce] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8306 (5622) RFC Errata System
Re: [Pce] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8306 (56… daniel