IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Pce] 答复: WGLC for draft-ietf-pce-lsp-extended-flags-02

Zhenghaomian <zhenghaomian@huawei.com> Mon, 30 May 2022 06:10 UTC

Return-Path: <zhenghaomian@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A651C14F741; Sun, 29 May 2022 23:10:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.908
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.908 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mrtJbRrZqcPX; Sun, 29 May 2022 23:10:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F06AAC14F742; Sun, 29 May 2022 23:10:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fraeml701-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.147.201]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4LBQ0c26r3z67gYW; Mon, 30 May 2022 14:06:56 +0800 (CST)
Received: from canpemm500010.china.huawei.com (7.192.105.118) by fraeml701-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.50) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.2375.24; Mon, 30 May 2022 08:10:15 +0200
Received: from canpemm500009.china.huawei.com (7.192.105.203) by canpemm500010.china.huawei.com (7.192.105.118) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2375.24; Mon, 30 May 2022 14:10:13 +0800
Received: from canpemm500009.china.huawei.com ([7.192.105.203]) by canpemm500009.china.huawei.com ([7.192.105.203]) with mapi id 15.01.2375.024; Mon, 30 May 2022 14:10:13 +0800
From: Zhenghaomian <zhenghaomian@huawei.com>
To: Dhruv Dhody <dd@dhruvdhody.com>, "pce@ietf.org" <pce@ietf.org>
CC: pce-chairs <pce-chairs@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-pce-lsp-extended-flags@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-pce-lsp-extended-flags@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Pce] WGLC for draft-ietf-pce-lsp-extended-flags-02
Thread-Index: AQHYZTsjQJWYMM6FX0CBp5+JtOHJoa02cucAgACaIEA=
Date: Mon, 30 May 2022 06:10:13 +0000
Message-ID: <b088d9df4a824db2867534247e985b93@huawei.com>
References: <CAP7zK5Yn30Kr00qOLLsPPNKOtHz-Q9z-pRe+aEqk1CYm1Co9Rg@mail.gmail.com> <CAP7zK5b7GFb=V7urPqvYqorP4D-RuQoED_Hc9JgXQmbacXTOHg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAP7zK5b7GFb=V7urPqvYqorP4D-RuQoED_Hc9JgXQmbacXTOHg@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.24.176.255]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_b088d9df4a824db2867534247e985b93huaweicom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/sWetCHIXM6ZkuTGCF5GUf3OkgFY>
Subject: [Pce] 答复: WGLC for draft-ietf-pce-lsp-extended-flags-02
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 May 2022 06:10:24 -0000

Hi WG,

I find this document useful as it specifies the approach for more flexible LSP flags, especially in cross-technology situation. I am writing to support the publication of this document.

Thank you.

Best wishes,
Haomian


发件人: Pce [mailto:pce-bounces@ietf.org] 代表 Dhruv Dhody
发送时间: 2022年5月30日 12:57
收件人: pce@ietf.org
抄送: pce-chairs <pce-chairs@ietf.org>; draft-ietf-pce-lsp-extended-flags@ietf.org
主题: Re: [Pce] WGLC for draft-ietf-pce-lsp-extended-flags-02

Hi WG,

Please respond to this WG LC. This is a tiny document with a much-needed extension and I am pretty sure more of you care about this than those who have responded so far!

Please respond by Wednesday 1st June.

Thanks!
Dhruv & Julien

On Wed, May 11, 2022 at 6:57 PM Dhruv Dhody <dd@dhruvdhody.com<mailto:dd@dhruvdhody.com>> wrote:
Hi WG,

This email starts a 2-weeks working group last call for draft-ietf-pce-lsp-extended-flags-02 [1].

Please indicate your support or concern for this draft. If you are opposed to the progression of the draft to RFC, please articulate your concern. If you support it, please indicate that you have read the latest version and it is ready for publication in your opinion. As always, review comments and nits are most welcome.

The WG LC will end on Wednesday 25th May 2022.

A general reminder to the WG to be more vocal during the last-call/adoption and help us unclog our queues :)

Thanks,
Dhruv & Julien

[1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-lsp-extended-flags/

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email