[Pce] Paul Wouters' Yes on draft-ietf-pce-pceps-tls13-03: (with COMMENT)

[Paul Wouters via Datatracker <[e-mail]>]

Paul Wouters has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-pce-pceps-tls13-03: Yes

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-pceps-tls13/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

       Implementations that support multiple versions of the TLS protocol MUST
       prefer to negotiate the latest version of the TLS protocol.

I'm a little confused why this needs to be stated as an update, as this is a
general requirement of TLS (or any versioned protocol really)

It might be useful to point to
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8446#section-4.2.1 that deals with how
to negotiate allowing TLS 1.2 when also supporting and preferring TLS 1.3.