Re: [Pce] draft-dhodylee-pce-pcep-ls next steps!

Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com> Wed, 25 August 2021 04:44 UTC

Return-Path: <hayabusagsm@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A9B33A07B8; Tue, 24 Aug 2021 21:44:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2drIG6PUjYsI; Tue, 24 Aug 2021 21:44:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pj1-x1030.google.com (mail-pj1-x1030.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1030]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C609E3A07AF; Tue, 24 Aug 2021 21:44:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pj1-x1030.google.com with SMTP id fs6so2260753pjb.4; Tue, 24 Aug 2021 21:44:16 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=4vfvE6Fn5sZQfsQJM/cqou83jfnZxqkAEkunWVkgiHc=; b=oiC6KasFskNzYGQkDUJEkK4jaJ/pFz1sLYlcTLg5+m++wsgxWxSvGA6v9RE7Liohy+ zaI/PUjmRGLxfLxtRun+IRdUi7S8cbPiwyGAonGa5i0DsLGvw5r5XyGPGe4LGqC+Qd5w ZZlXt6KvDUg4W4nxfBUXBeXebsHRRtgWp2b3hluZ9G9sWNMfLEYcfw0Jr6FEAIgpRYqI PeGBwI/kTzfRplEMLXOHJo5BUESyOxdbIA6p8TNj0fHb+t8eVTGRn2srG+G7+9mvcMZh CvGvVI4S+KE0FsnBiBIAKDD7JWB7ahrVYaBu1eyFk4QeRz1iZhnZguBo7zW1sIGlj+72 ErJg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=4vfvE6Fn5sZQfsQJM/cqou83jfnZxqkAEkunWVkgiHc=; b=kJ9Ibn4p724S7wseBsi/z25zvDS8/YPX/CABzle7cFrVtDkh9xf9FrzGBdsMNLTGGM 37BxoNmA0JLofyZt4uCb5bKYT+7c45LkWKHbwyiYVe0E023yUXyEak2VG0TaXB//cfJD h2Vb39NQRwhfVFJGI3Gha3IdWZa2w61vVOGiy2uFur5K16fB3n0WcHarm6uzrGqNrfYE UCmpZqvuBrLUOWBw0EGSUWUa3n1Eq2LIORgAC5GxbQLusfRh4e2kJORlXdP1VHeASX6o tyEvsvPEM5+WbLOB2UnZ9JPjoxhlWynNZQDoJqlnBYFBO/762uMuXeSIQW6CIBvsvLIh G5Qg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531KszSwYCenoSOlY8IKoFlv78NMm2jen5oANowIaehNSr48jGT1 HXAVfZPGgyTUe44GFk9fb1UJjvkPPcrvxW+xzcy8hxwe
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz5fasv+1u95sWW1N5PKahfVvcKTfYm21osIE9Haw5xi9+ClK11bg02lXb1tEgodDWaTeTRfId9+A7Uf4AMNxc=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:930e:: with SMTP id p14mr8352222pjo.132.1629866655794; Tue, 24 Aug 2021 21:44:15 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CABNhwV1hby7ap3DWQzxB2aV+ggVCeuDL89SNfaMA6RH0XiC8sQ@mail.gmail.com> <064a01d77c04$59272510$0b756f30$@olddog.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <064a01d77c04$59272510$0b756f30$@olddog.co.uk>
From: Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2021 00:44:04 -0400
Message-ID: <CABNhwV3YJW=g_MW5zz7zimB0SFGpgLa=Hd4GUfEAE_nVYyhV3g@mail.gmail.com>
To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
Cc: Dhruv Dhody <dd@dhruvdhody.com>, draft-dhodylee-pce-pcep-ls@ietf.org, pce@ietf.org, pce-chairs <pce-chairs@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/related; boundary="0000000000000da88105ca5ae7cc"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/vuUm9HeV_y8l4BO0WM-nr0uGiPs>
Subject: Re: [Pce] draft-dhodylee-pce-pcep-ls next steps!
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2021 04:44:24 -0000

Hi Adrian


See section 1.1 should have answers to your questions related to the
experimental draft.

https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-dhodylee-pce-pcep-ls-21.html#section-1.1


Kind Regards

Gyan
On Sun, Jul 18, 2021 at 2:40 PM Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk> wrote:

> Hi Gyan,
>
>
>
> I am very much in favour of positioning this work as Experimental.
>
>
>
> It is important (as with all IETF Experiments) to capture:
>
> -          What stops this extension “escaping" in the Internet?
>
> -          What stops this experiment clashing with other work or harming
> deployed equipment?
>
> -          How will you judge the success or failure of the experiment,
> and when?
>
> -          What follow-up to the experiment do you propose?
>
>
>
> Best,
>
> Adrian
>
>
>
> *From:* Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com>
> *Sent:* 05 July 2021 07:43
> *To:* Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>uk>; Dhruv Dhody <dd@dhruvdhody.com>om>;
> draft-dhodylee-pce-pcep-ls@ietf.org; pce-chairs <pce-chairs@ietf.org>rg>;
> pce@ietf.org
> *Subject:* draft-dhodylee-pce-pcep-ls next steps!
>
>
>
>
>
> Dear PCE WG,
>
>
>
> We presented the PCEP-LS [1] I-D [2] in the IETF 110 with a quick recap
> and a summary of past discussions. Some new scenarios such as PCECC, H-PCE
> were highlighted where the PCEP session could be reused.
>
>
>
> This is an experimental I-D with the aim to progress research and
> development efforts. This work is not a replacement for any of the existing
> mechanisms. There are specific scenarios highlighted where the reuse of
> PCEP sessions for this information is deemed useful. To make progress, it
> may not be useful to rehash the beauty context between everyone's favorite
> protocol :). What would be useful would be - finding out if there is still
> interest in this experimental work by some in the WG; are there strong
> technical objections for the experiment in its limited scope etc...
>
>
>
> As a next step, it would be good to define the scope of the experiments
> and expected output especially targeting the scalability concerns as well
> as impact in other protocols and the network, etc.
>
>
>
> From the last query on this draft March 18th we received positive feedback
> from Aijun Wang with China Telecom mentioned that as a telco are interest
> in deploying in their network PCEP-LS once the Huawei implementation is
> ready.  Aijun pointed out in the thread that using this draft simplifies
> the implementation of SDN controller.  One question asked by Aijun was
> related to section 9.2.1 LS Capability TLV R=1 remote allowed meaning
> hybrid mode to provide flexibility for operators not yet using SDN
> (SDN-like) SBI.  For any operators already using PCEP as SDN (SDN-like)
> SBI, a direct PCEP session already exist between all the nodes in the
> network and the PCE which would be the PCECV SDN scenario in which case the
> R flag in the open message is set to 0.
>
>
>
> We also received positive feedback from Peter Park with telco KT regarding
> interest in PCEP-LS.
>
>
>
> We also had feedback from Bin as they have implemented PCEP and have
> interest in this experimental implementation of this work.
>
>
>
> I would like to poll the WG again for interest in progressing research and
> development efforts of this draft as experimental.
>
>
>
> As stated in the last WG poll, I would like get feedback from the WG on
> scope of experiments especially related to scalability concerns and impact
> to other protocols on the network.
>
>
>
> Thanks!
>
> Gyan (on behalf of co-authors)
>
>
>
> [1]
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/110/materials/slides-110-pce-42-pcep-ls-00.pdf
>
> [2] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dhodylee-pce-pcep-ls/
>
> ==
>
>
>
> [image: Image removed by sender.] <http://www.verizon.com/>
>
> *Gyan Mishra*
>
> *Network Solutions Architect *
>
> *Email gyan.s.mishra@verizon.com <gyan.s.mishra@verizon.com>*
>
> *M 301 502-1347*
>
>
>
> --
>
> [image: Image removed by sender.] <http://www.verizon.com/>
>
> *Gyan Mishra*
>
> *Network Solutions Architect *
>
> *Email gyan.s.mishra@verizon.com <gyan.s.mishra@verizon.com>*
>
> *M 301 502-1347*
>
>
>
-- 

<http://www.verizon.com/>

*Gyan Mishra*

*Network Solutions A**rchitect *

*Email gyan.s.mishra@verizon.com <gyan.s.mishra@verizon.com>*



*M 301 502-1347*