[Pce] [Errata Verified] RFC8306 (5622)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Mon, 04 February 2019 22:24 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3348F12867A; Mon, 4 Feb 2019 14:24:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 48o7mmmsnxE2; Mon, 4 Feb 2019 14:24:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5289B127598; Mon, 4 Feb 2019 14:24:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id F3878B81D89; Mon, 4 Feb 2019 14:24:03 -0800 (PST)
To: adrian@olddog.co.uk, quintin.zhao@huawei.com, dhruv.ietf@gmail.com, ramanjaneya.palleti@huawei.com, daniel@olddog.co.uk
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 30:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: db3546@att.com, iesg@ietf.org, pce@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20190204222403.F3878B81D89@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2019 14:24:03 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/yYGy1mN1i8oJz3Mj4diKE4jb45I>
Subject: [Pce] [Errata Verified] RFC8306 (5622)
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2019 22:24:10 -0000
The following errata report has been verified for RFC8306, "Extensions to the Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) for Point-to-Multipoint Traffic Engineering Label Switched Paths". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5622 -------------------------------------- Status: Verified Type: Technical Reported by: Adrian FARREL <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Date Reported: 2019-02-04 Verified by: Deborah Brungard (IESG) Section: 3.13 Original Text ------------- The total PCEP message length, including the common header, is 16 bytes. Corrected Text -------------- The total PCEP message length, including the common header, is (2^16)-1 bytes. Notes ----- The message length field is 16 bits, so the maximum message length is (2^16)-1. -------------------------------------- RFC8306 (draft-ietf-pce-rfc6006bis-04) -------------------------------------- Title : Extensions to the Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) for Point-to-Multipoint Traffic Engineering Label Switched Paths Publication Date : November 2017 Author(s) : Q. Zhao, D. Dhody, Ed., R. Palleti, D. King Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Path Computation Element Area : Routing Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [Pce] [Errata Verified] RFC8306 (5622) RFC Errata System