Re: [PCN] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5696 (1969)

[Bob Briscoe <[e-mail]>]

RFC Editor,

I'm happy for the RFC Editor to correct this.

I'm also happy for it to remain uncorrected if the RFC Editor 
considers the RFC can stand as it is.

Cheers & Happy Christmas


Bob

At 13:18 21/12/2009, RFC Errata System wrote:

>The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5696,
>"Baseline Encoding and Transport of Pre-Congestion Information".
>
>--------------------------------------
>You may review the report below and at:
>http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=5696&eid=1969
>
>--------------------------------------
>Type: Editorial
>Reported by: Alfred Hoenes <[e-mail]>
>
>Section: A.2
>
>Original Text
>-------------
>(see Notes)
>
>Corrected Text
>--------------
>
>
>Notes
>-----
>Keep for Update: There's an unexpected/misplaced page break
>after the second bullet in Appendix A.2, on page 13.
>
>Instructions:
>-------------
>This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
>use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
>rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG)
>can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
>
>--------------------------------------
>RFC5696 (draft-ietf-pcn-baseline-encoding-07)
>--------------------------------------
>Title               : Baseline Encoding and Transport of 
>Pre-Congestion Information
>Publication Date    : November 2009
>Author(s)           : T. Moncaster, B. Briscoe, M. Menth
>Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
>Source              : Congestion and Pre-Congestion Notification
>Area                : Transport
>Stream              : IETF
>Verifying Party     : IESG

________________________________________________________________
Bob Briscoe,                                BT Innovate & Design