Re: [PCN] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5696 (1969)
<toby.moncaster@bt.com> Tue, 22 December 2009 09:35 UTC
Return-Path: <toby.moncaster@bt.com>
X-Original-To: pcn@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pcn@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B330D3A6B02 for <pcn@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Dec 2009 01:35:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.799
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.799 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.400, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_72=0.6, J_CHICKENPOX_91=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id K38Z0OImEpdL for <pcn@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Dec 2009 01:35:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp3.smtp.bt.com (smtp3.smtp.bt.com [217.32.164.138]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9335D3A681F for <pcn@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Dec 2009 01:35:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from E03MVZ1-UKDY.domain1.systemhost.net ([193.113.30.64]) by smtp3.smtp.bt.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Tue, 22 Dec 2009 09:35:19 +0000
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 09:35:18 -0000
Message-ID: <AEDCAF87EEC94F49BA92EBDD49854CC70E6A6E43@E03MVZ1-UKDY.domain1.systemhost.net>
In-Reply-To: <AEDCAF87EEC94F49BA92EBDD49854CC70E6A6E11@E03MVZ1-UKDY.domain1.systemhost.net>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [PCN] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5696 (1969)
Thread-Index: AcqCZgH6mBHiboojRMCfJ6APX9pMLQAgndUgAAAsBxA=
References: <200912211318.nBLDIk4r001270@boreas.isi.edu><200912211749.nBLHnhCh020584@bagheera.jungle.bt.co.uk> <AEDCAF87EEC94F49BA92EBDD49854CC70E6A6E11@E03MVZ1-UKDY.domain1.systemhost.net>
From: toby.moncaster@bt.com
To: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 Dec 2009 09:35:19.0493 (UTC) FILETIME=[13851F50:01CA82EA]
Cc: pcn@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Subject: Re: [PCN] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5696 (1969)
X-BeenThere: pcn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: PCN WG list <pcn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pcn>, <mailto:pcn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pcn>
List-Post: <mailto:pcn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pcn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pcn>, <mailto:pcn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 09:35:37 -0000
Using the terminology forwarded by Lars - I am happy for this to be "Hold for Document Update". If you are after WG consensus for all the other PCN errata reported by Alfred Hoenes (1968 & 1973-1976), I think I would suggest "Hold for Document Update" for all of them. They are all typographical in nature and have no impact on the content of the RFCs... Toby > -----Original Message----- > From: pcn-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:pcn-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of > toby.moncaster@bt.com > Sent: 22 December 2009 09:24 > To: Briscoe,RJ,Bob,XVR9 BRISCORJ R; rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org > Cc: ah@TR-Sys.de; pcn@ietf.org; rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org > Subject: Re: [PCN] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5696 (1969) > > Ditto - happy for this to be corrected or left as is... > > Toby > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Briscoe,RJ,Bob,XVR9 BRISCORJ R > > Sent: 21 December 2009 17:50 > > To: RFC Errata System > > Cc: Moncaster,T,Toby,DEE1 R; menth@informatik.uni-wuerzburg.de; > > magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com; lars.eggert@nokia.com; > sob@harvard.edu; > > slblake@petri-meat.com; ah@TR-Sys.de; pcn@ietf.org; rfc-editor@rfc- > > editor.org > > Subject: Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5696 (1969) > > > > RFC Editor, > > > > I'm happy for the RFC Editor to correct this. > > > > I'm also happy for it to remain uncorrected if the RFC Editor > > considers the RFC can stand as it is. > > > > Cheers & Happy Christmas > > > > > > Bob > > > > At 13:18 21/12/2009, RFC Errata System wrote: > > > > >The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5696, > > >"Baseline Encoding and Transport of Pre-Congestion Information". > > > > > >-------------------------------------- > > >You may review the report below and at: > > >http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=5696&eid=1969 > > > > > >-------------------------------------- > > >Type: Editorial > > >Reported by: Alfred Hoenes <ah@TR-Sys.de> > > > > > >Section: A.2 > > > > > >Original Text > > >------------- > > >(see Notes) > > > > > >Corrected Text > > >-------------- > > > > > > > > >Notes > > >----- > > >Keep for Update: There's an unexpected/misplaced page break > > >after the second bullet in Appendix A.2, on page 13. > > > > > >Instructions: > > >------------- > > >This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please > > >use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or > > >rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) > > >can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. > > > > > >-------------------------------------- > > >RFC5696 (draft-ietf-pcn-baseline-encoding-07) > > >-------------------------------------- > > >Title : Baseline Encoding and Transport of > > >Pre-Congestion Information > > >Publication Date : November 2009 > > >Author(s) : T. Moncaster, B. Briscoe, M. Menth > > >Category : PROPOSED STANDARD > > >Source : Congestion and Pre-Congestion Notification > > >Area : Transport > > >Stream : IETF > > >Verifying Party : IESG > > > > ________________________________________________________________ > > Bob Briscoe, BT Innovate & Design > > _______________________________________________ > PCN mailing list > PCN@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pcn
- [PCN] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5696 (1969) RFC Errata System
- Re: [PCN] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5696 (19… Bob Briscoe
- Re: [PCN] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5696 (19… toby.moncaster
- Re: [PCN] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5696 (19… toby.moncaster
- Re: [PCN] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5696 (19… Steven Blake
- Re: [PCN] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5696 (19… Steven Blake
- Re: [PCN] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5696 (19… slblake