Re: [pcp] WG Call for Adoption: Optimizing NAT and Firewall Keepalives Using Port Control Protocol (PCP)

[<[e-mail]>]

Hi all,

I support this work. 

I have one comment for the authors: consider adding some text to highlight PCP benefits to reduce keepalive messages when deployed in managed networks (i.e., both the underlying network and the service are managed by the same administrative entity). A typical example is SIP-based deployments: optimize the load on access service nodes (SBC, SBE, P-CSCF, etc.) because the lifetime of the mapping is known to the SIP UA and as such there is no need to issue frequent register messages to maintain the mapping alive, etc. 

Cheers,
Med

>-----Message d'origine-----
>De : [e-mail] [mailto:[e-mail]] De la part de
>Reinaldo Penno (repenno)
>Envoyé : lundi 29 juillet 2013 12:22
>À : [e-mail]
>Objet : [pcp] WG Call for Adoption: Optimizing NAT and Firewall Keepalives
>Using Port Control Protocol (PCP)
>
>Hello,
>
>This email starts a 2-week consensus call on adopting "Optimizing NAT and
>Firewall Keepalives Using Port Control Protocol (PCP)" as a WG item.
>
>     Title     : Optimizing NAT and Firewall Keepalives Using Port Control
>Protocol (PCP)
>     Author(s) : T. Reddy et al
>     Filename  : draft-reddy-pcp-optimize-keepalives-01
>     URL       :
>http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-reddy-pcp-optimize-keepalives-01
>
>Please read the current revision and state you opinion either for or
>against adoption in the mailing list.
>
>The call for adoption ends 12th August 2013.
>
>Thanks,
>
>Chairs
>
>_______________________________________________
>pcp mailing list
>[e-mail]
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pcp