Re: [pcp] WG Call for Adoption: draft-maglione-pcp-radius-ext-07

just had a quick look and i have a question:

If i understand correctly the packet format, you can't have a PCP server for IPv4 and a different PCP server for IPv6, unless the same DNS name is used; am i right?
Generally, how do you differentiate between v4 and v6 ones when the Dual-Stack context is used?
Is this left to the NAS to decide (based on what?) which one to pass to the co-located DHCPv4/v6 servers, or does the NAS pass everything to both DHCP servers?

...and some minor ones...
>    In such environment, PCP server's name can be configured on a RADIUS
>    server, which then passes the information to a NAS that co-locates
>    with the DHCPv4/DHCPv6 server, which in turn populates the location
>    of the PCP server.

Shouldn't this be the opposite? DHCP server that co-locates with the NAS.

> When the co-located DHCPv6 server receives a DHCPv6 message
>    containing the PCP Server Option, it SHALL use the name returned in
>    the RADIUS attribute as defined in this memo to populate the DHCPv6
>    PCP Server option defined in [I-D.ietf-pcp-dhcp <http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-maglione-pcp-radius-ext-07#ref-I-D.ietf-pcp-dhcp>].

When the co-located DHCPv6 server receives a DHCPv6 message from a client containing the PCP Server Option...

> The scenario with PPP Session and IPv4 only connectivity does not
>    require DHCPv4: the whole configuration of the client is performed by
>    PPP.  This case is out of scope of this document because in order to
>    complete the configuration of the PCP client a new PPP IPC option
>    would be required.

...a new PPP IPCP option..

--
Tassos

Reinaldo Penno (repenno) wrote on 26/04/2013 17:12:
> Hello,
>
> This email starts a 2-week consensus call on adopting "RADIUS Extensions
> for Port Control Protocol (PCP)" as a WG item.
>
>      Title     : RADIUS Extensions for Port Control Protocol (PCP)
>      Author(s) : R. Maglione et al
>      Filename  : draft-maglione-pcp-radius-ext-07
>      URL       : 
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-maglione-pcp-radius-ext-07
>
> Please read the current revision and state you opinion either for or
> against adoption (and with reasoning why) in the mailing list.
>
> The call for adoption ends 10th May 2013.
>
> Thanks,
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> pcp mailing list
> pcp@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pcp
>