Re: [pcp] PCP Call for Agenda Items at IETF 86 Orlando

Stuart Cheshire <cheshire@apple.com> Tue, 26 February 2013 03:25 UTC

MIME-version: 1.0
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET="US-ASCII"; delsp="yes"; format="flowed"
In-reply-to: <45A697A8FFD7CF48BCF2BE7E106F060408FFA42D@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com>
References: <45A697A8FFD7CF48BCF2BE7E106F060408FFA42D@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com>
Message-id: <690F65A7-2CB5-49CE-A026-4824CCB803B5@apple.com>
From: Stuart Cheshire <cheshire@apple.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 19:25:39 -0800
To: "Reinaldo Penno (repenno)" <repenno@cisco.com>, Dave Thaler <dthaler@microsoft.com>
Cc: "pcp@ietf.org" <pcp@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [pcp] PCP Call for Agenda Items at IETF 86 Orlando
Precedence: list

On 7 Feb, 2013, at 15:45, Reinaldo Penno (repenno) wrote:

> Hello,
>
> Please send slot requests to the chairs or reply to this email. In  
> your request include presentation title,  URL pointer to draft (if  
> any), presenter and time needed.

Can we add a ten-minute discussion of my four-page draft PCP Address  
Invalidation?

<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-cheshire-pcp-invalidate/>

This is not something I have energy to devote a lot of time to -- I  
just wrote it as a public service to the PCP community. We should  
either adopt it as a WG document and publish it, or abandon it. I  
think we should ask for WG consensus on which to do.

Stuart Cheshire

[pcp] PCP Call for Agenda Items at IETF 86 Orlando Reinaldo Penno (repenno)
Re: [pcp] PCP Call for Agenda Items at IETF 86 Or… Stuart Cheshire
Re: [pcp] PCP Call for Agenda Items at IETF 86 Or… Reinaldo Penno (repenno)