Re: [pcp] PCP Call for Agenda Items at IETF 86 Orlando

"Reinaldo Penno (repenno)" <repenno@cisco.com> Tue, 26 February 2013 04:06 UTC

From: "Reinaldo Penno (repenno)" <repenno@cisco.com>
To: Stuart Cheshire <cheshire@apple.com>, Dave Thaler <dthaler@microsoft.com>
Thread-Topic: [pcp] PCP Call for Agenda Items at IETF 86 Orlando
Thread-Index: AQHOBY01AaBwOovgbEut2XYoaA9ivJiL+2CA///Y/gA=
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 04:06:01 +0000
Message-ID: <45A697A8FFD7CF48BCF2BE7E106F060409012585@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <690F65A7-2CB5-49CE-A026-4824CCB803B5@apple.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.13.0.110805
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <69E0A0D143F4004B8530E50FBD8F92B0@cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "pcp@ietf.org" <pcp@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [pcp] PCP Call for Agenda Items at IETF 86 Orlando
Precedence: list

Yes, I will add a slot.

On 2/26/13 12:25 AM, "Stuart Cheshire" <cheshire@apple.com> wrote:

>On 7 Feb, 2013, at 15:45, Reinaldo Penno (repenno) wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Please send slot requests to the chairs or reply to this email. In
>> your request include presentation title,  URL pointer to draft (if
>> any), presenter and time needed.
>
>Can we add a ten-minute discussion of my four-page draft PCP Address
>Invalidation?
>
><https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-cheshire-pcp-invalidate/>
>
>This is not something I have energy to devote a lot of time to -- I
>just wrote it as a public service to the PCP community. We should
>either adopt it as a WG document and publish it, or abandon it. I
>think we should ask for WG consensus on which to do.
>
>Stuart Cheshire
>

[pcp] PCP Call for Agenda Items at IETF 86 Orlando Reinaldo Penno (repenno)
Re: [pcp] PCP Call for Agenda Items at IETF 86 Or… Stuart Cheshire
Re: [pcp] PCP Call for Agenda Items at IETF 86 Or… Reinaldo Penno (repenno)