IETF Logo Mail Archive

[pcp] WGLC: draft-ietf-pcp-anycast-02 comments due by NOV 10

Dave Thaler <dthaler@microsoft.com> Mon, 27 October 2014 20:23 UTC

Return-Path: <dthaler@microsoft.com>
X-Original-To: pcp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pcp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2C841AD443 for <pcp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 13:23:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LGafBm8gZ_IF for <pcp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 13:23:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from na01-bn1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bn1bon0719.outbound.protection.outlook.com [IPv6:2a01:111:f400:fc10::1:719]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B79AF1A19E8 for <pcp@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 13:23:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from BY2PR03MB412.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.141.141.25) by BY2PR03MB411.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.141.141.22) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.6.9; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 20:23:27 +0000
Received: from BY2PR03MB412.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([10.141.141.25]) by BY2PR03MB412.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([10.141.141.25]) with mapi id 15.01.0006.000; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 20:23:27 +0000
From: Dave Thaler <dthaler@microsoft.com>
To: "pcp@ietf.org" <pcp@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: WGLC: draft-ietf-pcp-anycast-02 comments due by NOV 10
Thread-Index: Ac/yI95Brf3vcxhCSdqFqWbTC/OErA==
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2014 20:23:27 +0000
Message-ID: <0d54be2504534facaaaddfb275ba982d@BY2PR03MB412.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [131.107.192.127]
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:BY2PR03MB411;
x-o365ent-eop-header: Message processed by - O365_ENT: Allow from ranges (Engineering ONLY)
x-forefront-prvs: 0377802854
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(199003)(164054003)(189002)(87936001)(2656002)(31966008)(122556002)(15975445006)(40100003)(85852003)(4396001)(92566001)(50986999)(54356999)(19300405004)(19580395003)(86362001)(86612001)(74316001)(80022003)(99396003)(46102003)(66066001)(20776003)(120916001)(64706001)(16236675004)(101416001)(99286002)(21056001)(97736003)(106356001)(2501002)(19625215002)(95666004)(15202345003)(110136001)(105586002)(230783001)(107046002)(108616004)(33646002)(229853001)(107886001)(76576001)(2351001)(85306004)(76482002)(24736002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:BY2PR03MB411; H:BY2PR03MB412.namprd03.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; MLV:sfv; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1; LANG:en;
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_0d54be2504534facaaaddfb275ba982dBY2PR03MB412namprd03pro_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: microsoft.onmicrosoft.com
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pcp/XjD_jtXUfs4H9v_ITHPR59axeb4
Subject: [pcp] WGLC: draft-ietf-pcp-anycast-02 comments due by NOV 10
X-BeenThere: pcp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: PCP wg discussion list <pcp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pcp>, <mailto:pcp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pcp/>
List-Post: <mailto:pcp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pcp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pcp>, <mailto:pcp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2014 20:23:54 -0000

This email initiates a Working Group Last Call on : draft-ietf-pcp-anycast-02 to conclude on

Monday, November 10th at the PCP WG meeting in Honolulu.  Please send comments to the list.



As a reminder, when responding to a WGLC, what we chairs are looking for is a statement about

document quality (not really about whether the mechanism should move forward).  That is,

state whether you think the document is ready as is, or if not, what issues you see.



Thanks,

-Dave

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email