[pcp] WGLC: draft-ietf-pcp-authentication-06 comments due by NOV 10

Dave Thaler <dthaler@microsoft.com> Tue, 28 October 2014 04:42 UTC

Return-Path: <dthaler@microsoft.com>
X-Original-To: pcp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pcp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93BE21A0470 for <pcp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 21:42:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.902
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QQRsOfLed8Bm for <pcp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 21:42:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from na01-bn1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bn1on0728.outbound.protection.outlook.com [IPv6:2a01:111:f400:fc10::728]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 232801A0469 for <pcp@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 21:42:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from BY2PR03MB412.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.141.141.25) by BY2PR03MB409.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.141.141.11) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.6.9; Tue, 28 Oct 2014 04:41:49 +0000
Received: from BY2PR03MB412.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([10.141.141.25]) by BY2PR03MB412.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([10.141.141.25]) with mapi id 15.01.0006.000; Tue, 28 Oct 2014 04:41:49 +0000
From: Dave Thaler <dthaler@microsoft.com>
To: "pcp@ietf.org" <pcp@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: WGLC: draft-ietf-pcp-authentication-06 comments due by NOV 10
Thread-Index: Ac/yaVkP64j8BQOKQIOd9a113sRmMg==
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2014 04:41:48 +0000
Message-ID: <041afbb8a65a471caa8e7baad4105994@BY2PR03MB412.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [98.237.193.222]
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:BY2PR03MB409;
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:;
x-forefront-prvs: 0378F1E47A
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(199003)(164054003)(189002)(97736003)(85306004)(46102003)(80022003)(86362001)(108616004)(2656002)(230783001)(101416001)(2501002)(106356001)(2351001)(99286002)(87936001)(105586002)(76576001)(229853001)(95666004)(122556002)(107886001)(4396001)(86612001)(74316001)(110136001)(21056001)(76482002)(85852003)(99396003)(33646002)(40100003)(64706001)(20776003)(66066001)(120916001)(54356999)(50986999)(24736002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:BY2PR03MB409; H:BY2PR03MB412.namprd03.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; MLV:sfv; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1; LANG:en;
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: microsoft.onmicrosoft.com
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pcp/o7o_Fp59KP1B0-4V1c2NJ-KYo8o
Subject: [pcp] WGLC: draft-ietf-pcp-authentication-06 comments due by NOV 10
X-BeenThere: pcp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: PCP wg discussion list <pcp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pcp>, <mailto:pcp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pcp/>
List-Post: <mailto:pcp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pcp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pcp>, <mailto:pcp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2014 04:42:16 -0000

This email initiates a Working Group Last Call on draft-ietf-pcp-authentication-06 to conclude on
Monday, November 10th at the PCP WG meeting in Honolulu.  Please send comments to the list.

As a reminder, when responding to a WGLC, what we chairs are looking for is a statement about 
document quality (not really about whether the mechanism should move forward).  That is, 
state whether you think the document is ready as is, or if not, what issues you see.

Thanks,
-Dave