[pcp] DESCRIPTION Option
<mohamed.boucadair@orange.com> Mon, 17 September 2012 11:27 UTC
Return-Path: <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>
X-Original-To: pcp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pcp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86EF121F862A for <pcp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Sep 2012 04:27:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.166
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.166 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.081, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Gz7csn-02UyR for <pcp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Sep 2012 04:27:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relais-inet.francetelecom.com (relais-ias91.francetelecom.com [193.251.215.91]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A84FB21F8628 for <pcp@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Sep 2012 04:27:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from omfedm07.si.francetelecom.fr (unknown [xx.xx.xx.3]) by omfedm12.si.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 1986118C409 for <pcp@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Sep 2012 13:27:00 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from PUEXCH21.nanterre.francetelecom.fr (unknown [10.101.44.28]) by omfedm07.si.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id F3ACB4C07D for <pcp@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Sep 2012 13:26:59 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from PUEXCB1B.nanterre.francetelecom.fr ([10.101.44.9]) by PUEXCH21.nanterre.francetelecom.fr ([10.101.44.28]) with mapi; Mon, 17 Sep 2012 13:26:59 +0200
From: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com
To: "pcp@ietf.org" <pcp@ietf.org>
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2012 13:26:58 +0200
Thread-Topic: DESCRIPTION Option
Thread-Index: Ac2Ux1m008btMKN5TYGgLLdL5dq1ew==
Message-ID: <94C682931C08B048B7A8645303FDC9F36E5A40CB0E@PUEXCB1B.nanterre.francetelecom.fr>
Accept-Language: fr-FR
Content-Language: fr-FR
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: fr-FR
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_94C682931C08B048B7A8645303FDC9F36E5A40CB0EPUEXCB1Bnante_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-PMX-Version: 5.6.1.2065439, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.2.376379, Antispam-Data: 2012.6.19.115414
Subject: [pcp] DESCRIPTION Option
X-BeenThere: pcp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: PCP wg discussion list <pcp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pcp>, <mailto:pcp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pcp>
List-Post: <mailto:pcp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pcp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pcp>, <mailto:pcp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2012 11:27:02 -0000
Dear all, In the Paris meeting (http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/83/minutes/minutes-83-pcp.txt), there was a suggestion to start discussion on the options defined in draft-boucadair-pcp-extensions. I will start the discussion with two options from that draft: DESCRIPTION and CAPABILITY Options. I will send a separate e-mail for the CAPABILITY Option. This message is to initiate discussion on DESCRIPTION Option: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-boucadair-pcp-description-option-00 The document indicates the code used for this option by implementations I'm aware of. Comments on the DESCRIPTION option are more than welcome. If you think the working group should spent or no effort on this specification, this is also a useful comment. Cheers, Med
- [pcp] DESCRIPTION Option mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [pcp] DESCRIPTION Option mohamed.boucadair