[pcp] CAPABILITY Option
<mohamed.boucadair@orange.com> Mon, 17 September 2012 11:32 UTC
Return-Path: <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>
X-Original-To: pcp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pcp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2707421F8525 for <pcp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Sep 2012 04:32:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.17
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.17 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.077, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8293OGiFkAt2 for <pcp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Sep 2012 04:32:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relais-inet.francetelecom.com (relais-ias92.francetelecom.com [193.251.215.92]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CC9721F8602 for <pcp@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Sep 2012 04:32:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from omfedm06.si.francetelecom.fr (unknown [xx.xx.xx.2]) by omfedm13.si.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 423D3324081 for <pcp@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Sep 2012 13:32:44 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from PUEXCH61.nanterre.francetelecom.fr (unknown [10.101.44.32]) by omfedm06.si.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 1E55927C053 for <pcp@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Sep 2012 13:32:44 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from PUEXCB1B.nanterre.francetelecom.fr ([10.101.44.9]) by PUEXCH61.nanterre.francetelecom.fr ([10.101.44.32]) with mapi; Mon, 17 Sep 2012 13:32:43 +0200
From: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com
To: "pcp@ietf.org" <pcp@ietf.org>
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2012 13:32:43 +0200
Thread-Topic: CAPABILITY Option
Thread-Index: Ac2UyCcvpinpZYfzQ2ufDGrkWZrYaw==
Message-ID: <94C682931C08B048B7A8645303FDC9F36E5A40CB16@PUEXCB1B.nanterre.francetelecom.fr>
Accept-Language: fr-FR
Content-Language: fr-FR
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: fr-FR
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_94C682931C08B048B7A8645303FDC9F36E5A40CB16PUEXCB1Bnante_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-PMX-Version: 5.6.1.2065439, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.2.376379, Antispam-Data: 2012.6.19.115414
Subject: [pcp] CAPABILITY Option
X-BeenThere: pcp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: PCP wg discussion list <pcp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pcp>, <mailto:pcp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pcp>
List-Post: <mailto:pcp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pcp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pcp>, <mailto:pcp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2012 11:32:48 -0000
Re-, In the Paris meeting (http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/83/minutes/minutes-83-pcp.txt<blocked::http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/83/minutes/minutes-83-pcp.txt>), there was a suggestion to start discussion on the options defined in draft-boucadair-pcp-extensions. I will start the discussion with two options from that draft: DESCRIPTION and CAPABILITY Options. I sent a separate message for the DESCRIPTION Option. This message is to initiate discussion on CAPABILITY Option: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-boucadair-pcp-capability-00 Comments on the CAPABILITY option are more than welcome. If you think the working group should spent or no effort on this specification, this is also a useful comment. Cheers, Med
- [pcp] CAPABILITY Option mohamed.boucadair