Re: [pcp] PREFIX64 PCP Option for NAT64: draft-boucadair-pcp-nat64-prefix64-option

<mohamed.boucadair@orange.com> Tue, 11 September 2012 09:50 UTC

Return-Path: <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>
X-Original-To: pcp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pcp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D39F21F8769; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 02:50:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.166
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.166 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.082, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MqY-C-MAjCcr; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 02:50:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relais-inet.francetelecom.com (relais-ias91.francetelecom.com [193.251.215.91]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 260C221F8764; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 02:50:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from omfedm07.si.francetelecom.fr (unknown [xx.xx.xx.3]) by omfedm10.si.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id D40052640EB; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 11:50:08 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from PUEXCH41.nanterre.francetelecom.fr (unknown [10.101.44.30]) by omfedm07.si.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id B3DA94C0C8; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 11:50:08 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from PUEXCB1B.nanterre.francetelecom.fr ([10.101.44.9]) by PUEXCH41.nanterre.francetelecom.fr ([10.101.44.30]) with mapi; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 11:50:04 +0200
From: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com
To: "teemu.savolainen@nokia.com" <teemu.savolainen@nokia.com>, "simon.perreault@viagenie.ca" <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca>
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 11:50:03 +0200
Thread-Topic: [pcp] PREFIX64 PCP Option for NAT64: draft-boucadair-pcp-nat64-prefix64-option
Thread-Index: Ac2MREsThTb5jn5dQvm14yeG1MbvVgAdLJUwAAPMTNAAAgZYgAADCg4QAAPxyvAAAq5H8ADA9/qg
Message-ID: <94C682931C08B048B7A8645303FDC9F36E5A10BF4F@PUEXCB1B.nanterre.francetelecom.fr>
References: <94C682931C08B048B7A8645303FDC9F36E57B08381@PUEXCB1B.nanterre.francetelecom.fr> <504898BD.7000702@viagenie.ca> <94C682931C08B048B7A8645303FDC9F36E57B08524@PUEXCB1B.nanterre.francetelecom.fr> <5048AC63.50700@viagenie.ca> <94C682931C08B048B7A8645303FDC9F36E57B085C5@PUEXCB1B.nanterre.francetelecom.fr> <5048C127.50704@viagenie.ca> <94C682931C08B048B7A8645303FDC9F36E57B08650@PUEXCB1B.nanterre.francetelecom.fr> <916CE6CF87173740BC8A2CE4430969620444ABB8@008-AM1MPN1-053.mgdnok.nokia.com> <94C682931C08B048B7A8645303FDC9F36E57B08727@PUEXCB1B.nanterre.francetelecom.fr> <916CE6CF87173740BC8A2CE44309696204453374@008-AM1MPN1-052.mgdnok.nokia.com> <94C682931C08B048B7A8645303FDC9F36E57B08811@PUEXCB1B.nanterre.francetelecom.fr> <916CE6CF87173740BC8A2CE4430969620445C977@008-AM1MPN1-053.mgdnok.nokia.com>
In-Reply-To: <916CE6CF87173740BC8A2CE4430969620445C977@008-AM1MPN1-053.mgdnok.nokia.com>
Accept-Language: fr-FR
Content-Language: fr-FR
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: fr-FR
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-PMX-Version: 5.6.1.2065439, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.2.376379, Antispam-Data: 2012.6.19.115414
Cc: "pcp@ietf.org" <pcp@ietf.org>, "behave@ietf.org" <behave@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [pcp] PREFIX64 PCP Option for NAT64: draft-boucadair-pcp-nat64-prefix64-option
X-BeenThere: pcp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: PCP wg discussion list <pcp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pcp>, <mailto:pcp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pcp>
List-Post: <mailto:pcp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pcp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pcp>, <mailto:pcp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 09:50:11 -0000

Hi Teemu,

Please see inline. 

Cheers,
Med 

>-----Message d'origine-----
>De : teemu.savolainen@nokia.com [mailto:teemu.savolainen@nokia.com] 
>Envoyé : vendredi 7 septembre 2012 15:17
>À : BOUCADAIR Mohamed OLNC/NAD/TIP; simon.perreault@viagenie.ca
>Cc : pcp@ietf.org; behave@ietf.org
>Objet : RE: [pcp] PREFIX64 PCP Option for NAT64: 
>draft-boucadair-pcp-nat64-prefix64-option
>
>Hi,

[...]
>
>> Med: I didn't asked for that. Sorry I was not clear: the 
>scope of this discussion
>> is: PCP-enabled networks.
>
>Thanks, in PCP-enabled networks it is definitely ok to skip 
>heuristics in favor for explicit configuration. 
>
>If you do go forward with explicit option, you could look if 
>you can resolve the "mapping of IPv4 address ranges to IPv6 
>prefixes" problem. Something better perhaps than asking from 
>PCP Server what is the Pref64::/n for a given IPv4 address..

Med: Thanks. I have just submited a new version which takes into account this comment. An OpCode is now supported to convey a list of  {IPv4 subnet, Prefix64::/n}. The new version is available at: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-boucadair-pcp-nat64-prefix64-option-01

>
>Best regards
>
>	Teemu
>