Re: [pcp] WGLC: draft-ietf-pcp-base-12.txt
Tina Tsou <tena@huawei.com> Sat, 04 June 2011 05:26 UTC
Return-Path: <tena@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: pcp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pcp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A80FE0676 for <pcp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 22:26:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.141
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.141 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.457, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id X5xM2lEn5lQK for <pcp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 22:26:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from usaga04-in.huawei.com (usaga04-in.huawei.com [206.16.17.180]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C450E0674 for <pcp@ietf.org>; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 22:26:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from huawei.com (usaga04-in [172.18.4.101]) by usaga04-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0LM900MIL33Q7C@usaga04-in.huawei.com> for pcp@ietf.org; Sat, 04 Jun 2011 00:26:15 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from TingZousc1 ([10.212.245.166]) by usaga04-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTPA id <0LM90093Y33KRU@usaga04-in.huawei.com> for pcp@ietf.org; Sat, 04 Jun 2011 00:26:14 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2011 22:26:07 -0700
From: Tina Tsou <tena@huawei.com>
In-reply-to: <9B57C850BB53634CACEC56EF4853FF653B0E7836@TK5EX14MBXW601.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com>
To: 'Dave Thaler' <dthaler@microsoft.com>, pcp@ietf.org
Message-id: <01bb01cc2277$eb072b70$c1158250$@com>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Boundary_(ID_O8HxpRLAQmXsrSiOZg+aOA)"
Content-language: en-us
Thread-index: AcwXKk61FuyajK7hRbulosJtjQ9K5wK/sVTgABOocjA=
References: <9B57C850BB53634CACEC56EF4853FF653B0BA0FD@TK5EX14MBXW604.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com> <9B57C850BB53634CACEC56EF4853FF653B0E7836@TK5EX14MBXW601.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com>
Subject: Re: [pcp] WGLC: draft-ietf-pcp-base-12.txt
X-BeenThere: pcp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: PCP wg discussion list <pcp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pcp>, <mailto:pcp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pcp>
List-Post: <mailto:pcp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pcp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pcp>, <mailto:pcp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Jun 2011 05:26:17 -0000
Dear all, In section7, there is one description: "It is REQUIRED that the PCP-controlled device assign the same external IP address to PCP-created explicit dynamic mappings and to implicit dynamic mappings." It is only a requirement to CGN, but some existing CGN may not support this requirement as defined in RFC4787-[REQ1]: "Some NATs use the external IP address mapping in an arbitrary fashion (i.e., randomly): one internal IP address could have multiple external IP address mappings active at the same time for different sessions" Therefore, I suggest the PCP client should also support this requirement which was actually defined in 00 version but deleted in later versions (maybe I missed the reason of the text change): If there is any existing PCP mapping, PCP client should only request the same external IP address as the one of those existing mappings. The reason is that it will allow applications that use multiple ports originating from the same internal IP address to also have the same external IP address. Have a good weekend. We keep our promises with one another - no matter what! Best Regards, Tina TSOU http://tinatsou.weebly.com/contact.html From: pcp-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:pcp-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Dave Thaler Sent: Friday, June 03, 2011 1:02 PM To: pcp@ietf.org Subject: Re: [pcp] WGLC: draft-ietf-pcp-base-12.txt Some comments on -12 are in the marked up copy at http://research.microsoft.com/users/dthaler/draft-ietf-pcp-base-12.pdf -Dave From: pcp-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:pcp-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Dave Thaler Sent: Friday, May 20, 2011 1:18 PM To: pcp@ietf.org Subject: [pcp] WGLC: draft-ietf-pcp-base-12.txt This message starts a two-week WGLC on http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-pcp-base-12.txt This last call will conclude on June 3rd at 5pm EST. Please send your comments to the list. We are scheduling a WebEx call shortly after the WGLC concludes, and will send out details in separate email. Thanks, -Dave and Alain
- Re: [pcp] WGLC: draft-ietf-pcp-base-12.txt Dan Wing
- Re: [pcp] WGLC: draft-ietf-pcp-base-12.txt Paul Selkirk
- [pcp] WGLC: draft-ietf-pcp-base-12.txt Dave Thaler
- Re: [pcp] WGLC: draft-ietf-pcp-base-12.txt Alain Durand
- Re: [pcp] WGLC: draft-ietf-pcp-base-12.txt Dave Thaler
- Re: [pcp] WGLC: draft-ietf-pcp-base-12.txt Tina Tsou
- Re: [pcp] WGLC: draft-ietf-pcp-base-12.txt Dan Wing
- Re: [pcp] WGLC: draft-ietf-pcp-base-12.txt Stuart Cheshire
- Re: [pcp] WGLC: draft-ietf-pcp-base-12.txt Tina Tsou
- [pcp] PCP Issue #24, PCP mappings same public IP … Dan Wing
- Re: [pcp] WGLC: draft-ietf-pcp-base-12.txt Francis Dupont
- Re: [pcp] PCP Issue #24, PCP mappings same public… Tina Tsou