Re: [pcp] Is it the right place to document something for PCP in mobile network

GangChen <phdgang@gmail.com> Wed, 28 March 2012 09:10 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <94C682931C08B048B7A8645303FDC9F36E287331FE@PUEXCB1B.nanterre.francetelecom.fr>
References: <CAM+vMESUo3KJKQ5rub-KPpciTT12xr0U+xBykOz1PnSpEAgOaQ@mail.gmail.com> <94C682931C08B048B7A8645303FDC9F36E287331FE@PUEXCB1B.nanterre.francetelecom.fr>
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 17:09:59 +0800
Message-ID: <CAM+vMERp7qrMmBStO-uSS1vaUU+cB-A4yD5ohaM9gti9DsrRrA@mail.gmail.com>
From: GangChen <phdgang@gmail.com>
To: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: "pcp@ietf.org" <pcp@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [pcp] Is it the right place to document something for PCP in mobile network
Precedence: list

> Of course, the document need restrict the scope to major
> issues (e.g., PCP Server Discovery).

Fully agree


Gang

2012/3/28, mohamed.boucadair@orange.com <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>:
> Hi Gang, all,
>
> I do personally think it is valuable to have this document as Informational.
>
> As mentioned by Gang, we have tried in the past to initiate a study item
> within 3GPP but this was not successful because there is (surprisingly) no
> function to be controlled by PCP (!!!)
>
> Since we are aware there are plenty functions (e.g., NAT) which may benefit
> from the help of PCP to achieve goals such as better application experience,
> better battery utilization, etc, a document dealing with some of mobile
> considerations is needed.
>
> Having a document covering PCP-related considerations in mobile networks
> would provide a pointer for operators to be included in their UE profile
> requirements. Of course, the document need restrict the scope to major
> issues (e.g., PCP Server Discovery).
>
> Cheers,
> Med
>
>>-----Message d'origine-----
>>De : pcp-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:pcp-bounces@ietf.org] De la
>>part de GangChen
>>Envoyé : mardi 27 mars 2012 18:04
>>À : pcp@ietf.org
>>Objet : [pcp] Is it the right place to document something for
>>PCP in mobile network
>>
>>Hello all,
>>
>>Thanks for your attention on today meeting for
>>http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-chen-pcp-mobile-deployment-00
>>
>>Chairman encourages me to launch this thread due to limited times on
>>the meeting.
>>As I already stated in slides (see attached), PCP in mobile network is
>>attempted to be a work item in 3GPP. But it failed because 3GPP
>>thought NAT and Firewalls are going beyond their scope.
>>
>>Considering very particular environments of mobile network and goals
>>of PCP technology, it's of necessity to document something either to
>>encourage PCP deployment in mobile network or raise specific concerns
>>from mobile network part.
>>
>>If there are no such considerations, I guess operators may struggle
>>with transplanting PCP into mobile context.
>>Very typical case is when doing PCP discovery, DHCP may not possible
>>because lacking of supporting in 3GPP network.
>>
>>That motivates us to raise the question here. Otherwise, it likely
>>would become grey zone.
>>
>>BRs
>>
>>Gang
>>

[pcp] Is it the right place to document something… GangChen
Re: [pcp] Is it the right place to document somet… mohamed.boucadair
Re: [pcp] Is it the right place to document somet… GangChen
Re: [pcp] Is it the right place to document somet… DIEGO LOPEZ GARCIA
Re: [pcp] Is it the right place to document somet… Vízdal Aleš